Climate Finance Utilization in Africa and Asia: Economic Outcomes and Policy Effectiveness
アフリカとアジアにおける気候資金の活用：経済的成果と政策効果 (AI 翻訳)
Sakshi Vyas, Jacob Machaka, Lefu Elias Matsikitlane, Anuoluwapo Enitan Popoola
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
南アフリカ、ナイジェリア、インドの気候資金の実施状況を、政策一貫性、実施、影響、経済効果、構造的障害の5つの視点から分析。各国ともパリ協定に整合する政策を掲げるが、実施ギャップが顕著で、資金量よりも制度の質と調整能力が成果を左右することを示す。
English
This paper analyzes climate finance implementation in South Africa, Nigeria, and India using a five-lens framework: policy coherence, implementation, impact, economic outcomes, and structural barriers. It finds that despite alignment with global agreements, implementation gaps persist, and institutional quality and coherent governance matter more than finance volume.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は途上国向け気候資金供与を拡大しており、本論文の制度・実施ギャップ分析はODAやJCMの効果的運用に示唆を与える。また、国内のGX推進でも制度設計と実施の一貫性が重要であることを再認識させる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global climate finance scholarship by highlighting that institutional quality and policy coherence are critical for translating finance into impact, relevant for international climate finance architecture and donor coordination.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for assessing climate finance effectiveness in emerging economies.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of institutional capacity and policy coherence for project implementation.
🏛政策担当者:Informs climate finance allocation and governance reforms in developing countries.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACTThe use of climate finance has become one of the most significant means of combating climate change at the international level, but its conversion into tangible impacts has been extremely uneven in the Global South. The aim of this paper is to examine how the three largest emerging economies, South Africa, Nigeria, and India, implement climate finance and whether the national policy framework is effective in translating finance into tangible impacts. The fivelens approach used for the examination includes policy coherence, implementation, evidence of impact, economic impact, and structural obstacles. The question to be examined is whether the funds work. Based on the results from the analysis, it becomes evident that while all three countries have indeed taken real efforts to align themselves with global conventions like the Paris Agreement and the UNFCCC, there are implementation gaps when it comes to ground realities. There have been positive developments on the part of South Africa and its REIPPPP and on the part of India and its NAPCC. However, both initiatives still face serious issues related to fragmented governance and lack of financing resources. Nigeria, even though its policy framework has become quite ambitious, suffers from poor institutional coordination, high administrative costs and persistent under-financing of adaptation activities. It is evident that the key determining factor here is not finance but quality of institutions and coherent implementation practices. Keywords: Climate Finance, Policy Coherence, Implementation Effectiveness, Emerging Economies, Global South, Institutional Governance, Energy Transition
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21362540first seen 2026-08-03 04:45:53 · last seen 2026-08-03 04:46:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。