← 論文一覧に戻る

Puoli vuosikymmentä turvealan oikeudenmukaista siirtymää: Katsaus turveyrittäjien siirtymäodotuksiin ja nykytilanteeseen

Hanna Lempinen, Kari Laasasenaho, Johanna Kivioja, Risto Lauhanen, Jarkko K. Niemi, Anu Palomäki, Annukka Vainio

Alue ja Ympäristö📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-10-22#エネルギー転換対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.30663/ay.180712
原典: https://doi.org/10.30663/ay.180712

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

フィンランドのエネルギー泥炭廃止政策（2019年発表）を事例に、影響を受ける小規模泥炭事業者の移行期における期待・不安と現在の個人的・経済的状況をレビューした研究。支援策の実効性と、グリーン転換が生む新たな経済機会が最も影響を受けた事業者に届いているかを検証する。移行政策が「公正」と感じられたかを問い、欧州の公正なグリーン転換の議論に一石を投じる。

English

A review examining Finland's energy peat phase-out announced in 2019, focusing on how small-scale peat entrepreneurs experienced the transition and what their personal and economic situation looks like now. It assesses whether support mechanisms and new green economic opportunities reached those most affected, and whether transition policies were perceived as just. The findings feed into broader European debates on the unkept promises of a just green transition.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも石炭・地域産業の退出支援や公正な移行（just transition）がGX政策の論点となりつつあり、影響を受ける事業者への支援設計や地域経済への配慮の参考になる。SSBJ開示とは直接の接点は薄いが、移行計画の社会面（S）評価に関心を持つ読者に有用。

In the global GX context

As ISSB/CSRD transition-plan disclosures increasingly require social and workforce considerations, this Finnish case offers empirical grounding on how just-transition policies are experienced by affected small businesses. It informs the 'S' dimension of transition finance and the credibility of corporate and national phase-out commitments.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:公正な移行政策の実効性を事業者視点で評価する実証的手法と、期待と現実のギャップ分析の枠組みを学べる。

🏢実務担当者:エネルギー転換に伴うサプライヤー・地域事業者への影響と支援策の設計示唆を、移行計画の社会面検討に活用できる。

🏛政策担当者:産業退出政策において、影響を受ける小規模事業者への支援と新規グリーン機会の分配設計が政策の公正性評価に直結することを示す。

📄 Abstract（原文）

Accelerating climate change has emphasized the need to implement policy measures that are able to deliver fast emission reductions in a just manner. In Finland, efforts to reduce energy related carbon dioxide emissions have focused especially on the phase-out of energy peat. Since the phase-out was announced in 2019, the share of peat in Finland's energy mix has fallen below two percent. At the same time, the peat industry continues to employ a significant number of small-scale peat entrepreneurs, whose current situations and transition experiences remain poorly understood. In this review article, we aim to improve the contemporary understanding of both the support mechanisms that have been available for peat entrepreneurs during the transition as well as about the situation of entrepreneurs still operating in the peat industry. Specifically, we ask: what did the experiences and expectations of peat entrepreneurs look like when the phase-out began? What does their personal and economic situation look like now, and to what extent did their fears and expectations become reality? We are especially interested in whether and to what extent the new green economic opportunities brought on by the green transition have been available for those most impacted by the peat phase out and the extent to which the transition policies have been experienced as just by peat entrepreneurs. Our observations take part in broader national and European discussions about the (unkept) promises of just green transition and support the planning of more just sustainability transition policies in the context of energy peat and beyond.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。