Green Budgeting Strategy for Waste Sector Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: A QSPM-Based Approach in Bogor City
廃棄物部門の温室効果ガス削減のためのグリーンバジェティング戦略：ボゴール市におけるQSPMに基づくアプローチ (AI 翻訳)
Ridwan Adithiansyah, A. Faroby Falatehan, Sri Mulatsih
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、インドネシア・ボゴール市の環境局を対象に、廃棄物部門の温室効果ガス（GHG）排出削減のための予算配分戦略を定量的戦略計画マトリックス（QSPM）を用いて策定した。2017～2024年の支出データを機能別に再分類し、記述分析、探索的線形回帰、SWOT分析を組み合わせた。その結果、コア緩和活動への支出は総緩和支出の約6分の1に過ぎず、回帰分析ではコア緩和への百万ルピア追加が2年後に約3.2トンのCO2換算排出削減と関連することが示された。戦略的位置は「維持・保持」象限にあり、大規模有機廃棄物処理が最優先戦略と評価された。
English
This paper develops a budget allocation strategy for GHG mitigation in the waste sector of Bogor City, Indonesia, using the QSPM framework. Spending data from 2017–2024 was reclassified into core mitigation, downstream, and support categories. Exploratory regression shows each additional million IDR for core mitigation is associated with a 3.2-ton CO2e reduction two years later. Core mitigation accounts for only one-sixth of total mitigation spending, and strategic analysis recommends large-scale organic waste processing via partnerships as the top priority.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の自治体でも廃棄物分野のGHG削減は重要課題であり、本稿の予算再分類と戦略策定手法は参考になる。ただしインドネシアの事例であり、日本の廃棄物処理制度・補助金構造との違いに留意が必要。SSBJ開示における自治体のGHG排出量算定・削減計画にも示唆を与えうる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global climate finance literature by highlighting that allocative quality, not budget size, drives mitigation effectiveness in the waste sector. The QSPM approach offers a replicable framework for municipal governments worldwide seeking to optimize limited resources for GHG reduction. It complements TCFD/ISSB-aligned disclosure by demonstrating how to link public spending to emission outcomes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Methodology combining budget reclassification, regression, and QSPM for waste sector mitigation strategy is valuable for replication and extension.
🏢実務担当者:Municipal environmental agencies can adopt the budget analysis and QSPM process to prioritize waste mitigation investments.
🏛政策担当者:Illustrates the importance of tracking core mitigation spending vs. operational costs to improve GHG reduction effectiveness.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Background: The waste sector is a local authority emission source whose mitigation depends on structure of public expenditure rather than its size alone. Objective: This study formulates a budget allocation strategy for the Bogor City Environmental Agency (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup [DLH]) to support greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction in the waste sector. Methods: Spending data from 2017–2024 were functionally reclassified into core mitigation, downstream operational, and supporting components to ensure comparability across the 2021 fiscal nomenclature transition. The analysis combined descriptive methods, exploratory multiple linear regression with a COVID-19 dummy variable and a two-year lag (n = 6), and a strategic management framework comprising the Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) matrix, External Factor Evaluation (EFE) matrix, Internal–External (IE) matrix, Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, and Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) assessed by nine purposively selected expert respondents. Results: Core mitigation activities absorbed only approximately one-sixth of total mitigation spending, while downstream operations dominated budget allocation, and proportion allocated to core mitigation tended to shrink after 2018. Exploratory regression indicated that each additional million rupiah allocated to core mitigation was associated with an approximately 3.2-ton reduction in CO₂-equivalent (CO₂eq) emissions two years later (p = 0.021). The strategic position analysis placed DLH in a hold-and-maintain quadrant. Among seven identified strategies, large-scale organic waste processing through partnerships received the highest QSPM score, with the top four strategies forming a complementary priority cluster. Conclusion: The findings indicate allocative quality, rather than budget volume alone, determines the effectiveness of mitigation spending.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.59261/jbt.v7i3.731first seen 2026-07-29 06:33:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。