Agroforestry, Climate Resilience, and Land Degradation in OECD Economies: Roles of Innovation and Finance
Yu Fu, Zhengjie Yang, Zhang Bing, Hong Zhang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はOECD諸国1994〜2021年のデータを用い、森林農業・金融市場・イノベーション・環境税・最終消費支出が領域ベースCO2排出に与える非線形効果を分析した。森林農業は逆U字型を示し、初期段階では土地劣化を招くが後段では気候レジリエンスと土地回復を支える。金融発展は異質な効果を持ち、グリーンイノベーションと環境税は排出を有意に削減する。
English
Using OECD data 1994–2021, this study examines nonlinear effects of agroforestry, financial markets, innovation, environmental taxes, and consumption expenditure on territory-based CO2 emissions. Agroforestry shows an inverted-U: early stages may degrade land, later stages support climate resilience and restoration. Green innovation and environmental taxes significantly cut emissions, while financial development has heterogeneous effects.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
森林農業・環境税・グリーンイノベーションの組み合わせは、日本の農林業分野でのGX政策やカーボンクレジット（J-クレジット）設計を考える上での参考になる。ただしOECD横断分析であり日本固有の示唆は限定的。
In the global GX context
Adds cross-country OECD evidence on how environmental taxation and green innovation interact with land-based carbon and resilience—relevant to the land-use and agriculture chapters of ISSB/CSRD disclosure and to nature-related (TNFD) transition planning.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:森林農業と排出の非線形関係、金融発展の異質効果を検証する実証枠組みとして参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:農林業サプライチェーンを持つ企業が、土地関連排出・自然資本リスクの評価に環境税やイノベーション投資を組み込む際の示唆。
🏛政策担当者:環境税とグリーンイノベーション支援を森林農業の段階的発展に合わせて設計する適応的枠組みの根拠を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Despite the growing prominence of agroforestry practices in environmental research, its specific impact on climate‐induced land vulnerability, land degradation, and territorial carbon dioxide emissions is insufficiently explored in OECD economies. This study investigates how nonlinear effects of agroforestry practices, financial markets, innovation, environmental taxes, along with final consumption expenditure, determine territory‐based carbon emissions in OECD countries over the period 1994–2021. This study applied the second‐generation Driscoll–Kraay technique to analyze the data, while quantile regression serves as a nonparametric approach as a robustness check. The results show that agroforestry has inverted‐U shaped curve underlying that agroforestry in the initial stages may cause land degradation while at the later stages, it supports the climate resilience practices and land restoration in OECD economies. Moreover, financial development exerts heterogeneous effects in both models, suggesting differing channels of support for financial development. Green innovation and environmental taxes significantly reduce territorial carbon emissions, while final consumption expenditure, as theoretically expected, increases it. The results show robustness through nonparametric quantile regression with the role of income. Policy implications emphasize the adaptive framework of financial mechanisms, innovation, and environmental taxation to support agroforestry practices in a customized yet constantly focused manner on the reduction of emissions while supporting the development of climate resilience strategies in OECD economies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70768first seen 2026-11-14 05:23:00
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。