Peatland Rewetting for Climate Change Mitigation
気候変動緩和のための泥炭地再生 (AI 翻訳)
Dewy Verhoeven, Deniz Kilic, Suphi Şen, Hans-Peter Weikard
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
泥炭地の排水による温室効果ガス排出と農業生産のトレードオフを最適制御モデルで分析。オランダの泥炭牧草地に適用し、即時再生が社会的に最適であることを示した。政策により排出を約55%削減し、年間約100万トンのCO2を節約。炭素価格に応じて純便益が40〜123億ユーロ増加する。
English
This paper develops an optimal control model to analyze the tradeoff between peatland drainage for agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions. Applied to Dutch peat meadows, it finds immediate rewetting is socially optimal for most parcels, reducing emissions by 55% and saving about 1 Mt CO2 annually. Net social benefits increase by €4-12.3 billion depending on carbon price.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では泥炭地は少ないが、農地の温室効果ガス削減や土地利用政策の経済分析手法は参考になる。特に、炭素価格を考慮した費用便益分析は、日本の農業政策や土地利用計画に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a rigorous economic framework for evaluating land-use policies in the context of climate mitigation. It offers insights for global peatland management and demonstrates how carbon pricing can be integrated into agricultural policy decisions, relevant to EU and other regions with peat soils.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel optimal control model for peatland management with parcel-level data, useful for land-use and climate policy research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a framework for assessing the economic viability of rewetting projects, relevant for agricultural and environmental management teams.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the social benefits of immediate rewetting and the importance of carbon pricing in land-use policy decisions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Draining peatlands to allow agricultural production causes subsidence through peat oxidation, which is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. Addressing this tradeoff, we develop an optimal control model of peat subsidence accounting for emissions, water management costs, and agricultural productivity. We apply this model to the Dutch peat meadows by constructing a new dataset at the parcel level using a geospatial model of land subsidence. We find that immediate rewetting or strong drainage reduction is socially optimal for most of the parcels. The optimal policy reduces subsidence and emissions by about 55 percent, saving about 1 Mt of CO2 annually. Relative to maintaining current drainage practices, accounting for climate costs increases net social benefits by 4 to 12.3 billion Euros depending on the carbon price.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.65864/tm7fpkds6jfirst seen 2026-08-08 04:50:25
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。