How Indonesia’s Mining Sector Can Support a Just and Sustainable Energy Transition Through an Integrated Sustainability Framework
Muhammad Rizki Aflahul Muzhidin, Sahat Hutajulu, Yos Sunitiyoso, Pri Hermawan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドネシアの鉱業が公正で持続可能なエネルギー移行にどう貢献できるかを、文献レビュー・政策分析・二次データの三角測量で検討。付加価値化と脱炭素、投資加速とガバナンス、輸出競争力と生態系、国益と地域分配という4つの緊張を特定。環境保全・社会正義・経済変革・適応的ガバナンスの4本柱と5つの政策経路（鉱山・精錬電力の脱炭素、ESG連動許認可、地域価値捕捉、電力・気候計画との整合、移行指標の制度化）を提案する。
English
This article builds an integrated sustainability framework for how Indonesia's mining sector can support a just, low-carbon energy transition. Using literature review, policy analysis, and secondary-data triangulation, it identifies four tensions: value-added industrialization vs. decarbonization, investment vs. governance, export competitiveness vs. ecological integrity, and national strategy vs. local justice. It proposes four pillars and five policy pathways, including decarbonizing mine/smelter power, ESG-linked permitting, and transition metrics.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は重要鉱物の多くをインドネシア等から調達し、自動車・電池サプライチェーンの脱炭素と人権対応が課題。本枠組みはSSBJ/Scope3開示や調達先ESGデューデリの実務に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Critical-mineral governance is central to global transition finance and disclosure debates (ISSB, CSRD, EU CRMA). This framework links mineral expansion to ESG-linked permitting and accountability metrics, offering a policy tool for jurisdictions balancing downstreaming with decarbonization.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:重要鉱物と公正な移行を統合的に捉える分析枠組みと4つの緊張の整理が参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:インドネシア調達先のESGデューデリやScope3・人権対応の評価軸として活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:鉱物戦略と電力・気候計画の整合、ESG連動許認可、移行指標の制度化が政策設計の参考になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Indonesia occupies a strategically important position in the global energy transition because it is both a major producer of transition minerals and a country pursuing domestic decarbonization.This article develops an integrated sustainability framework to examine how Indonesia's mining sector can contribute to a just and sustainable energy transition without reproducing carbon-intensive, socially uneven, and weakly governed development pathways.The study adopts a mixed-method design that combines a targeted literature review, policy analysis, and triangulation of secondary data from official and authoritative sources on mineral production, electricity generation, national energy planning, and climate commitments.The results identify four interdependent sustainability tensions that shape the sector's transition role: value-added industrialization versus decarbonization, investment acceleration versus governance quality, export competitiveness versus ecological integrity, and national strategic gains versus local distributive justice.In response, the article proposes an integrated framework structured around four pillars: environmental integrity, social justice and inclusion, economic transformation, and adaptive governance.The framework is translated into five policy pathways: decarbonizing mine and smelter power supply, strengthening environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-linked permitting and monitoring, expanding local value capture and community safeguards, aligning mineral strategy with electricity and climate planning, and institutionalizing transition metrics for accountability.The article concludes that Indonesia's mining sector should not be evaluated solely through output growth or downstream investment, but through its capacity to deliver low-carbon industrial value, equitable development, and credible environmental stewardship.The framework contributes a policy-relevant tool for governments, firms, and researchers seeking to govern critical-mineral expansion in ways that support long-term sustainability and a just transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.56578/cis140504first seen 2026-10-12 04:40:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。