Why Biden-era clean energy investment policies had limited political returns.
バイデン政権のクリーンエネルギー投資政策が限定的な政治的リターンしかもたらさなかった理由 (AI 翻訳)
Alexander F. Gazmararian, Nathan M. Jensen, Dustin Tingley
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
バイデン政権の大規模なクリーンエネルギー投資政策が有権者の支持獲得に結びつかなかった要因を分析。地理的位置情報と調査データを用いて、投資の可視性と政治家への帰属認識を検証。住民は投資を認識するが、連邦政府ではなく州知事に功績を帰属させる傾向が確認された。
English
This study analyzes why Biden-era clean energy investments failed to translate into political support. Using geolocated survey data and company/politician statements, it finds that while people near new facilities noticed them, they credited governors, not the President. The fragmented credit attribution limits the electoral returns of green spending.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は、クリーンエネルギー政策の政治的受容における情報環境の重要性を示唆。日本においても、GX投資の効果を政策支持に結びつけるためには、地方自治体や企業との協調した情報発信が重要であることを示唆する。
In the global GX context
This paper highlights the importance of message environment for translating climate investments into public support. Globally, policymakers should consider that credit attribution can be fragmented, reducing electoral payoffs. It offers lessons for designing communication strategies around green transition.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers studying the political economy of climate policy can learn about the empirical measurement of policy visibility and credit attribution using geolocated data.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note that clean energy investments may not automatically generate public support if credit is dispersed across multiple actors; coordinated communication is crucial.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The Biden Administration enacted the largest federal policy framework to incentivize clean energy and decarbonization in U.S. history. We examine whether Biden-era green investments produced political returns by affecting public opinion. Using geolocated survey data linked to investment records and a database of company and politician statements, we assess project visibility and credit attribution. People closer to new renewable energy and green manufacturing facilities are more likely to notice these investments but are not more likely to credit the Biden Administration. Instead, the public sees governors as most responsible. This credit allocation pattern aligns with the political message environment: Governors more frequently claim credit than the White House and companies spread recognition broadly across political actors. This fragmented information environment illustrates the limits of using less traceable forms of green spending to generate electoral gains and public support for climate policy.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2526802123first seen 2026-05-15 20:34:29 · last seen 2026-06-12 05:59:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。