Sediment properties influence seagrass sedimentary carbon stocks, challenging uniform blue carbon accounting
堆積物特性が海草の堆積性炭素貯蔵量に影響を与え、均一なブルーカーボン会計に挑戦する (AI 翻訳)
Heidi McIlvenny, Annika Clements, Sarah Helyar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
北アイルランドの海草藻場における堆積性有機炭素貯蔵量を初めて広域評価し、場所により18.6~280.8 Mg C/haと10倍以上の差があることを発見。炭素貯留は堆積物特性(粒度・エネルギー環境)に強く依存し、一律のブルーカーボン会計は不適切であることを示した。安定同位体分析により、炭素の起源は海草由来と外部由来の混合であることも判明。
English
This study provides the first regional assessment of sedimentary organic carbon stocks in Northern Ireland seagrass meadows, revealing high variability (18.6-280.8 Mg C/ha) influenced by sediment properties rather than seagrass presence alone. Carbon stocks are highly heterogeneous, challenging uniform blue carbon accounting and advocating for stratified, region-specific approaches.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではブルーカーボン生態系の炭素クレジット化が進むが、本論文は一律の係数適用のリスクを示唆し、地域ごとの実測と層別化の必要性を強調する。日本の海草藻場の炭素貯留評価においても、堆積物特性を考慮したサイト別アプローチが求められる。
In the global GX context
This study highlights the failure of a one-size-fits-all approach in blue carbon accounting, directly impacting global carbon offset markets and national greenhouse gas inventories under UNFCCC. It provides strong empirical evidence that physical setting must be integrated into carbon stock estimates, aligning with the emerging need for high-resolution, context-specific carbon accounting frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a rigorous method for assessing seagrass carbon stocks and identifies sediment properties as key predictors, informing future sampling designs and modeling.
🏢実務担当者:For entities involved in blue carbon projects or coastal management, this study underscores the need for site-specific measurements to avoid overestimating or underestimating carbon credits.
🏛政策担当者:Policy implications for national GHG inventories and blue carbon crediting schemes: stratification by hydrogeomorphic setting is necessary for accurate reporting.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Seagrass meadows are increasingly recognised as important blue carbon ecosystems, yet large uncertainties in regional sedimentary organic carbon (C org ) stocks limit their inclusion in greenhouse gas accounting. Northern Ireland supports extensive seagrass meadows across diverse hydrogeomorphic settings but lacks empirically derived carbon stock estimates. Here, we present the first regionally representative assessment of sedimentary C org storage in Northern Ireland seagrass meadows. Sediment cores were collected from nine intertidal and subtidal meadows and analysed for carbon content, sediment properties, and stable carbon isotopes, with adjacent unvegetated sediments used as references where available. Sediment C org stocks to 1 m depth averaged 109.7 ± 18.9 Mg C ha -1 but varied by more than an order of magnitude among sites (18.6 - 280.8 Mg C ha -1 ). Seagrass sediments retained higher carbon at depth than unvegetated sediments, indicating enhanced burial and carbon permanence, although surface carbon enhancement was highly site dependent. Multivariate analyses identified sediment properties, used as proxies for hydrodynamic setting, as dominant factors influencing carbon storage, with fine-grained, low-energy systems supporting substantially higher stocks per hectare than more exposed, coarse-grained environments. Stable isotope mixing models showed that sediment carbon commonly comprised a mixture of seagrass-derived and allochthonous material, indicating that high carbon stocks are not restricted to autochthonous production alone. These results show that seagrass carbon storage in Northern Ireland is highly heterogeneous, influenced by physical setting rather than seagrass presence alone, and must be represented using stratified, regionally resolved approaches in blue carbon accounting.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1809172first seen 2026-06-17 05:54:52 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:14:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。