From Green Transition to Green Grabbing
グリーン・トランジションからグリーングラッビングへ (AI 翻訳)
Yogi Setya Permana
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、インドネシアのポコレオク地域における地熱開発を事例に、民主的な後退が進む中での「グリーングラッビング」（環境言説によって正当化される資源収奪）のメカニズムを分析する。法的枠組みの弱体化と先住民・ジャーナリストへの弾圧が、持続可能性の名の下に土地収奪を促進することを明らかにし、国際的な気候投資が不平等と紛争を拡大するリスクを指摘する。
English
This chapter examines 'green grabbing'—resource dispossession legitimized through environmental narratives—amid democratic regression, using Indonesia's geothermal development in Poco Leok as a case study. It identifies two mechanisms: legal-institutional weakening of safeguards and criminalization of resistance, showing how international climate investments can exacerbate inequality when democratic safeguards are fragile.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はインドネシアの地熱開発に積極的に関与しており、本論文はJICAや民間企業による海外気候投資が現地のガバナンス不全により逆効果となる可能性を示唆する。日本企業のサプライチェーンにおける人権デューデリジェンスや、途上国支援における民主的プロセスへの配慮の重要性を再認識させる内容。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on energy transition justice by linking climate finance to democratic accountability. It challenges the assumption that green investments are inherently beneficial, arguing that in regressive democracies, sustainability discourses can mask extractivism—a critical insight for ISSB/CSRD non-financial reporting on human rights and for transition finance guardrails.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a political ecology framework to analyze how democratic regression enables green grabbing, relevant for scholars of energy justice and climate finance.
🏢実務担当者:Provides a warning for firms investing in geothermal or other renewable projects in politically fragile regions: robust safeguards and community engagement are essential to avoid reputational and operational risks.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for climate finance mechanisms to include democratic governance conditions, relevant for development banks, bilateral donors, and climate funders.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This chapter examines green grabbing amidst democratic regression through Indonesia’s geothermal development in Poco Leok, East Nusa Tenggara. While green grabbing – resource dispossession legitimised through environmental narratives – is often associated with authoritarian contexts, this study shows how it operates within regressive democracies. Drawing on political ecology and democratisation scholarship, this chapter identifies two interlinked mechanisms: (1) a legal-institutional framework that facilitates land appropriation by weakening environmental and participatory safeguards, and (2) the criminalisation of Indigenous and journalistic resistance. These dynamics reveal how shrinking civic space and elite legal manipulation legitimise dispossession under sustainability discourses. The Poco Leok case demonstrates how international climate investments can exacerbate inequality and conflict when democratic safeguards are fragile. Contributing to debates on energy transition justice, this chapter argues that climate finance must be grounded in political accountability. Democratic regression not only erodes civil liberties but also enables new forms of extractivism under green transition agendas.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003783176-12first seen 2026-07-28 04:55:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。