gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

From Green Growth to Transition Pains: Regional Asymmetry and Intertemporal Mismatch of Green Finance in China’s “Rust Belt”

グリーン成長から移行の痛みへ:中国「ラストベルト」におけるグリーンファイナンスの地域非対称性と異時点間のミスマッチ (AI 翻訳)

Bingzi He, Fanglei Zhong

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-02-11#トランジション・ファイナンスOrigin: CN
DOI: 10.3390/su18041839
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041839

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、中国の旧工業地域(ラストベルト)に焦点を当て、グリーンファイナンスとグリーン全要素生産性(GTFP)の関係を分析。2006~2023年の省別パネルデータを用いた結果、沿岸部では正の関係が見られる一方、内陸・東北の旧工業地域では負の関係が確認された。これは、一律のグリーンクレジットが移行期に生産性の谷を生む可能性を示唆し、グリーンファイナンスからトランジションファイナンスへの補完的な政策転換の必要性を提起する。

English

This paper analyzes the relationship between green finance and green total factor productivity (GTFP) in China's legacy industrial regions (Rust Belt). Using a province-year panel from 2006-2023, it finds that green finance is positively associated with GTFP in eastern coastal provinces but negatively in central and northeastern legacy industrial provinces. This nonlinear pullback supports an intertemporal mismatch hypothesis, suggesting that uniform green credit policies may amplify transition risks and that transition finance is needed as a complement.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

中国のラストベルト事例は、北海道や北九州など地域的な産業転換に直面する日本に示唆を与える。一律のグリーンファイナンスが移行リスクを増幅する可能性を示し、日本のGX政策においても地域特性を考慮したトランジションファイナンスの必要性を裏付ける。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence from China on the asymmetric regional effects of green finance, reinforcing the global call for transition finance instruments. It aligns with discussions on just transition and the need for tailored policies to avoid exacerbating regional disparities during decarbonization, relevant to EU and ISSB frameworks.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Offers a rigorous empirical methodology for measuring GTFP and identifying regional heterogeneity, valuable for scholars studying green finance and productivity.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the risk of uniform green credit tightening for legacy industries, encouraging financial institutions to develop transition finance products.

🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates the need for region-specific green finance policies and the integration of transition finance tools to mitigate uneven impacts.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Green finance is often viewed as being linked to sustainable growth, yet its effects may be uneven across regions with different industrial legacies. This paper examines how green finance correlates with green total factor productivity (GTFP) in China, with a focus on the country’s legacy industrial regions (broadly referred to as the “Rust Belt” in this paper), spanning Northeastern and Central China. Using a province–year panel for 30 mainland provinces over 2006–2023, we measure GTFP with a Slacks-Based Measure–Global Malmquist–Luenberger (SBM–GML) index that accounts for undesirable outputs. To reduce simultaneity concerns, we estimate two-way fixed-effects models and conduct robustness checks, including lag-based specifications; nevertheless, the observational design implies that the estimates should be interpreted as stable associations rather than definitive causal effects. We reveal a concerning stylized fact: despite rapid growth in green finance, GTFP in legacy industrial provinces exhibits a nonlinear pullback. More formally, we document pronounced regional heterogeneity: green finance is positively related to GTFP in eastern coastal provinces but negatively related to GTFP in central and northeastern legacy industrial provinces. Our findings are consistent with the theoretical prediction of an intertemporal mismatch in Schumpeterian creative destruction: standardized green-credit tightening coincides with tighter liquidity conditions for incumbent high-carbon sectors, while green entrants in these regions may scale up only gradually, leaving a temporary output and productivity “valley” during the transition. The results suggest that uniform green-finance policies may amplify transition risks in legacy industrial regions, motivating a shift from purely “green finance” toward complementary “transition finance” tools.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。