← 論文一覧に戻る

Integrated Planning of New Energy Systems: Environmental Trade-Offs and Sustainability Pathways

新エネルギーシステムの統合的計画:環境のトレードオフと持続可能性の道筋 (AI 翻訳)

Jiangtao Ma

Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-16#エネルギー転換Origin: CN対象セクター: energy
DOI: 10.30564/jees.v8i7.13291
原典: https://doi.org/10.30564/jees.v8i7.13291

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

このレビューは、高比再生可能エネルギーとセクター連携を含む新エネルギーシステムの統合計画に焦点を当て、環境影響、トレードオフ、持続可能性経路を包括的に評価する。最適化、シミュレーション、ハイブリッド手法を分析し、ライフサイクルアセスメントや多次元評価の重要性を強調。中国、パキスタン、韓国、マレーシアの事例を基に、脱炭素と環境保護のバランスの課題を示し、今後の研究課題を提示する。

English

This review comprehensively assesses integrated planning approaches for new energy systems with high renewable shares and sector coupling. It evaluates optimization, simulation, and hybrid methods, emphasizing life-cycle assessment and multi-dimensional environmental evaluation. Case studies from China, Pakistan, South Korea, and Malaysia highlight trade-offs between decarbonization and ecological impacts, identifying research gaps for deeper environmental integration.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のエネルギー計画においても、再生可能エネルギーの大量導入やセクター連携が進む中で、環境トレードオフを考慮した統合計画の重要性が高まっている。本レビューは、日本が直面する同様の課題に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, integrated energy system planning increasingly must address environmental trade-offs beyond carbon reduction. This review provides a framework for balancing decarbonization, resource use, and ecological impacts, relevant for policymakers and planners in diverse contexts.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive taxonomy of planning frameworks and environmental integration methods, highlighting research gaps in life-cycle assessment and sector-coupling models.

🏢実務担当者:Offers guidance for energy companies and system operators on incorporating environmental trade-offs into planning, with case studies demonstrating practical challenges.

🏛政策担当者:Underlines the need for policy frameworks that reconcile decarbonization targets with broader environmental sustainability, informing integrated resource planning regulations.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The rapid transition toward low-carbon energy systems is creating increasingly complex and interconnected energy structures characterized by high shares of renewable energy, sector coupling, and advanced conversion and storage technologies. To manage these systems while achieving decarbonization, security, reliability, and sustainability goals simultaneously, integrated energy system planning has become essential. However, most existing planning studies primarily emphasize techno-economic optimization and greenhouse gas reduction, while long-term environmental impacts and sustainability considerations remain insufficiently addressed. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of integrated planning approaches for new energy systems, with a particular focus on environmental impacts, trade-offs, and sustainability pathways. It examines major planning frameworks, including optimization-based, simulation-based, and hybrid methods, and evaluates how environmental factors are incorporated into system design. Special attention is given to life-cycle assessment, multi-dimensional environmental evaluation, and the role of sector coupling in shaping system-wide environmental outcomes. By comparing environmental trade-offs across sectors, spatial scales, and time horizons, the review highlights inherent tensions between decarbonization objectives, resource consumption, and ecological impacts. Case studies from China, Pakistan, South Korea, and Malaysia illustrate how integrated planning is applied under diverse socio-economic and policy conditions. Finally, the review identifies key research gaps, emphasizing the need for deeper environmental integration, improved data and model connectivity, and pathway-based planning to support environmentally sustainable and resilient energy transitions.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。