救済的ステークホルダー理論を通じて気候政策とエネルギー正義を整合させる
Aligning climate policy with energy justice through remedial stakeholder theory (原題)
Tracey Dodd, Tim Nelson, Harry J. Van Buren
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は「救済的ステークホルダー理論」を提唱し、気候変動とエネルギー転換を過去・現在・未来の組織行動が交差する事例として分析する。長年にわたりGHG排出の環境コストを外部化して利益を蓄積してきたエネルギー企業に対し、歴史的損害への責任認識と修復的実践を転換戦略の中心に据えるよう求める。分配的正義にとどまらず、手続的・回復的正義を時間軸で組み込む気候政策設計の規範的枠組みを提示する。
English
This paper proposes 'remedial stakeholder theory' as a normative framework spotlighting organisational responsibility for historical environmental harms. Using climate change and the energy transition as its case, it argues that energy firms which externalised GHG costs must acknowledge and remediate past contributions through reparative transition strategies. It links this to climate policy by extending fairness beyond present distributive justice to procedural and restorative justice over time.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ・有報開示やトランジション・ファイナンスが進む中、排出責任の歴史的側面や『移行の公正』をどう企業開示・対話に織り込むかは議論が浅い。本稿の規範枠組みは、日本企業が移行計画で歴史的責任と地域・脆弱層への配慮をどう説明するかを考える材料になる。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD and transition-plan disclosure mature, regulators and investors increasingly ask how firms account for historical emissions and just-transition impacts. This paper offers a normative lens for embedding restorative and procedural justice into transition plans and climate policy design, complementing the largely present-focused disclosure frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:規範的ステークホルダー理論と気候正義・移行政策の接点を理論的に整理する枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:移行計画やサステナビリティ報告で歴史的排出責任や公正な移行への説明をどう位置づけるかの概念的ヒントになる。
🏛政策担当者:分配的正義だけでなく手続的・回復的正義を気候・エネルギー政策設計に組み込む視点を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
We contribute to this special issue by exploring climate policy and energy justice through the lens of remedial stakeholder theory. While stakeholder theory traditionally focuses on present and forward-looking relationships, we argue that climate change and the energy transition provide a compelling case to examine the nexus of past, present, and future organisational action. Many energy companies, which are legally incorporated entities (in some cases with more than one hundred years of existence), have accumulated substantial profits through business models that externalised the environmental costs of greenhouse gas emissions, with particularly negative effects on the countries that contributed the least to them. These emissions have significantly contributed to human-induced climate change, which is projected to plunge millions further into climate-related poverty, particularly in vulnerable and low-income communities. To address this challenge, we propose an extended view of stakeholder theory—remedial stakeholder theory—as a normative framework that spotlights organisational responsibility for historical environmental harms. This model urges firms, especially in the energy sector, to acknowledge and remediate past contributions to climate change by centring reparative practices in their transition strategies. Remedial stakeholder theory connects with climate policy by offering a foundation for designing policies and corporate responses that go beyond distributive fairness in the present to include procedural and restorative justice over time. In doing so, our paper provides a lens to assess how climate and energy policies can more equitably address the burdens and benefits of the energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09190-9first seen 2026-10-25 04:36:39 · last seen 2026-11-04 04:38:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。