吸収台帳：「不足分は誰が負担するか？北米CCS補助金におけるデリスキングと条件選択」の収録記録
The Absorption Ledger: deposited record for "Who absorbs the shortfall? Derisking and the selection of conditions in North American carbon capture subsidies (原題)
Perazich, Milan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は米国・カナダ・アルバータ州のCCS向け公的支援に付された条件を2005〜2026年にわたり台帳化し、交付条件・行為条件・保持条件・デリスキング措置に分類する。67の資金制度、46の条件、28の回収プロジェクトを収録し、条件設計が受給者のリスク負担をどう変えるかを再現可能な形で公開している。
English
This deposit records every condition attached to public support for carbon capture in the US, Canada and Alberta from 2005-2026, classifying them as delivery, conduct, retention conditions or derisking devices. It provides a census of 67 funding instruments, a ledger of 46 conditions, 28 capture projects and reproducible code, showing how subsidy conditionality allocates shortfall risk.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではCCSはGX推進戦略の重点分野であり、JOGMECやGX機構による支援制度の条件設計（交付金の出来高連動・回収条項）を考える上で、北米の制度設計とリスク配分の実例は直接的な参照材料となる。
In the global GX context
As governments scale 45Q-style and contract-for-difference CCS subsidies, this work offers a systematic framework for how conditionality shifts delivery risk onto recipients—directly relevant to ISSB-era disclosure of subsidy dependence and transition finance structuring.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CCS補助金の条件設計とリスク配分を定量比較できる再現可能なデータセットとコードを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:自社のCCSプロジェクトが公的支援の出来高条件や回収条項にどう晒されるかを評価する枠組みとして使える。
🏛政策担当者:CCS支援制度の条件設計が受給者のリスク負担と事業実現性に与える影響を制度設計に反映できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The evidence behind the article “Who absorbs the shortfall? Derisking and the selection of conditions in North American carbon capture subsidies”. It records every condition attached to public support for carbon capture in the United States, Canada and Alberta from 2005 to 2026, and classifies each by what it exposes the recipient to: delivery conditions (money withheld, reduced or recovered according to the tonnes a plant captures or stores against a figure fixed in advance), conduct conditions, retention conditions and derisking devices. The workbook holds a census of 67 federal and Alberta funding instruments (sheet T18); a ledger of 46 conditions with the codebook, the counts and twelve alternative codings, all computed by formula (T17 and Summary); a consistency check of the classes by model coders (T17b); a census of 28 capture projects with their outcome classes and the coders’ agreement (T1, T5, T5b); the money tables and terminations (T11, T13); 35 scoped negatives, each with the document that would overturn it (T9); and a provenance table of 225 entries giving, for each fact, the document, its identifier and the passage relied on (T8). The outcome coding materials are carried from version 4.3: the frozen coder instructions, the evidence pack, the worked example, the class reference, the blank coding sheet, the reliability calculator and both coders’ returns. classify.py writes each ledger row’s money rule as code and computes whether a plant capturing a tenth of its design keeps the support (exposure_rules.csv in, computed_rows.csv out). fig1.py and fig2.py redraw Figures 1 and 2 from fig1_events.csv and fig2_data.csv. model_coder_instructions.md gives the instructions used in the consistency check. checksums.txt lists the SHA-256 of every new file.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/23864574first seen 2026-11-02 04:13:31 · last seen 2026-11-04 04:13:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。