Carbon Pricing in Aviation: Comparative Effectiveness of ETS vs. CORSIA
航空における炭素価格付け：排出権取引制度とCORSIAの有効性比較 (AI 翻訳)
Kush Dave
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、航空部門の炭素価格付けとしてEU-ETSとCORSIAを比較分析。ETSは限定的ながら排出削減効果と強い価格シグナルを生み出したが、競争力懸念がある。CORSIAは初のグローバルスキームだが、オフセット依存と執行の弱さが課題。将来の効果には、より強固なガバナンスとオフセット基準の向上、地域とグローバルシステムの連携が必要。
English
This paper compares the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and CORSIA as carbon pricing mechanisms in aviation. The ETS has achieved modest emission reductions and stronger price signals within Europe but faces competitiveness concerns. CORSIA is the first global scheme but relies heavily on offsets and has weaker enforcement. Future effectiveness depends on stronger governance, higher offset standards, and coordination between regional and global systems.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の航空業界にとって、国際的な炭素価格制度の動向は重要。本論文はEU-ETSとCORSIAの比較を通じて、日本の航空政策や国際的なカーボンプライシングへの示唆を提供。特に、日本がCORSIA参加国としてオフセット市場に関与する中、制度設計の課題を理解する助けとなる。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a comparative analysis of two major carbon pricing schemes in aviation, relevant for global climate policy. It highlights trade-offs between environmental integrity and inclusivity, offering insights for policymakers designing sectoral carbon pricing. The findings are pertinent for international aviation negotiations and the evolution of CORSIA.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Synthesizes existing evidence on aviation carbon pricing, identifying research gaps on offset quality and governance.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams in aviation can use this to understand regulatory trends and prepare for carbon pricing compliance.
🏛政策担当者:Regulators should note the need for stronger offset standards and coordination between ETS and CORSIA.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Aviation has been a growing source of greenhouse gas emission, and recent years have seen the development of market-based measures to address its global climate impact (Kumar et al., 2025). The European Union's Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the International Civil Aviation Organization's Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) represent two distinct approaches to carbon pricing in the sector. Existing research shows that the ETS has achieved modest emission reductions within Europe and created stronger price signals, while CORSIA marks the first attempt to establish a global scheme. However, both approaches face challenges: the ETS is limited in scope and raises competitiveness concerns, whereas CORSIA relies heavily on offsets and has weaker enforcement mechanisms (Bonnet-Cantalloube, 2024). A comparative analysis of the available literature suggests that ETS provides stricter environmental incentives, while CORSIA prioritizes inclusivity across states. It concludes that the future effectiveness of aviation carbon pricing will depend on stronger governance, higher standards for offsets, and closer coordination between regional and global systems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6049014first seen 2026-05-14 21:15:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。