Hydrogen Fuel as an Alternative Energy Source for Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Vessels: A Comprehensive Business Case Analysis
浮体式生産貯蔵積出設備（FPSO）向け代替エネルギー源としての水素燃料：包括的ビジネスケース分析 (AI 翻訳)
Onyeabor S
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この研究は、FPSO船舶における水素燃料の技術的実現可能性、環境影響、経済的妥当性を調査。従来のディーゼル燃料と比較し、水素燃料は温室効果ガス排出をほぼゼロにする一方、初期投資（CAPEX）が約2～3億ドルと従来の5700万ドルに比べ高く、貯蔵インフラや安全面での課題も指摘。定性分析と費用便益評価に基づき、長期的には規制インセンティブや運営効率の向上でコスト回収の可能性を示唆。
English
This study examines the feasibility, environmental impact, and economic viability of hydrogen fuel for FPSO vessels. While hydrogen offers near-zero emissions, it requires CAPEX of $200-300M vs $57M for conventional fuel. Barriers include storage infrastructure and safety. Long-term regulatory incentives and efficiency gains may offset costs.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は海洋資源開発と水素サプライチェーン構築を国家戦略に掲げる。本分析は、FPSO事業者やエンジニアリング企業が水素転換を検討する際のビジネスケースの基礎を提供する。
In the global GX context
Globally, maritime decarbonization is a key focus for IMO and EU regulations. This paper provides a structured business case for hydrogen adoption in offshore oil and gas production vessels, relevant for companies navigating the energy transition in offshore operations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a baseline business case model for hydrogen fuel adoption in FPSO operations.
🏢実務担当者:Can use the CAPEX/OPEX comparison and risk assessment to inform investment decisions for hydrogen retrofitting or new builds.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for regulatory incentives and infrastructure support to overcome high upfront costs.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The global maritime industry faces mounting pressure to transition toward cleaner, more sustainable energy sources, particularly in energy-intensive offshore operations. This study investigates the technical feasibility, environmental implications, and economic viability of adopting hydrogen (H₂) fuel as an alternative energy source for Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessels, which currently rely predominantly on conventional marine diesel and gas oil. Through a qualitative research methodology involving interviews with 10 marine industry professionals, complemented by a Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM) analysis, comparative cost-benefit evaluation, and a PESTLE framework assessment, this research examines the multifaceted challenges and opportunities associated with hydrogen fuel adoption in FPSO operations. Key findings reveal that while hydrogen fuel systems offer significant environmental benefits, including near-zero greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced regulatory compliance, substantial barriers persist in terms of initial capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational costs (OPEX), storage infrastructure limitations, and safety considerations. The study employs Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) and Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolysis methods for hydrogen production assessment, evaluating power generation capacities ranging from 80-150 MW, typical for FPSO operations. Economic analysis indicates that H₂ fuel FPSO systems require CAPEX investments of $200-300 million compared to $57 million for conventional fuel systems, though operational efficiency gains and regulatory incentives may offset long-term costs. This research contributes to the emerging body of knowledge on maritime decarbonisation strategies and provides stakeholders with a comprehensive business case model for informed decision-making regarding hydrogen fuel FPSO investments.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Research Square https://doi.org/10.14293/pr2199.003640.v1first seen 2026-07-03 04:25:42 · last seen 2026-07-05 04:33:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。