Road transport carbon pricing creates uneven burdens across Europe and requires targeted revenue recycling
道路輸送の炭素価格は欧州全体で不均等な負担を生み、的を絞った歳入還元が必要 (AI 翻訳)
Stefano Menegat, Silvana Dalmazzone, Vito Frontuto
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
欧州の道路燃料への炭素価格導入が、23カ国の家計に与える影響を調べた研究。家計調査データを用いてガソリン・ディーゼル価格上昇をシミュレーションし、所得・地域間の負担格差を分析。高所得西欧諸国では低所得層の相対的負担が大きく、東欧では自家用車へのアクセス制限が負担を小さく見せている。公平な炭素価格には、的を絞った歳入還元と低炭素モビリティ投資が必要と結論。
English
This study examines the household impacts of a forthcoming EU carbon price on road fuels across 23 countries. Using harmonized budget data adjusted for underreporting, it simulates fuel price increases and compares burdens across income groups and regions. It finds that lower-income households in richer western countries bear larger relative burdens, while in eastern countries lower burdens often reflect limited car access. The authors argue for targeted revenue recycling and investment in low-carbon mobility to ensure fairness.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、2028年度からの化石燃料賦課金（GX-ETS）導入が検討されており、家庭部門への影響と負担軽減策が論点。本論文の所得・地域別の負担分析手法は、日本のGX-ETS設計における公平性確保や、地方部のモビリティ確保策を検討する上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
This paper provides rigorous empirical evidence on the distributional effects of carbon pricing in road transport, directly relevant to global debates on carbon pricing fairness and revenue recycling. As the EU ETS2 expands to road fuels, the findings inform policy design in other jurisdictions, including emerging carbon pricing schemes and just transition considerations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a robust cross-country methodology for assessing distributional impacts of carbon pricing, useful for comparative policy analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for companies to anticipate carbon pricing costs and potential revenue recycling mechanisms affecting consumer demand.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence that targeted revenue recycling and investment in low-carbon mobility are essential for equitable carbon pricing.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Road transport is a major source of planet-warming emissions, and carbon pricing of fuels is increasingly used to encourage cleaner mobility. Yet higher fuel prices can affect households differently depending on income, location and transport options. Here we show how a forthcoming European carbon price on road fuels could affect households in 23 countries. Using harmonized household budget data adjusted for underreported fuel purchases, we simulate higher petrol and diesel prices and compare burdens across and within income groups. Effects differ strongly across regions. In richer western countries, lower-income households often bear a larger relative burden. In several lower-income eastern countries, the policy appears less burdensome for poorer households, but this often reflects their limited access to private mobility rather than greater fairness. Across countries, households are more exposed when they depend on cars, live in less accessible areas, or lack public transport alternatives. Fair carbon pricing therefore requires targeted revenue recycling and investment in low-carbon mobility options.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-026-00129-4first seen 2026-08-15 04:45:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。