gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Energy Justice and the Transition to Renewable Energy in Africa: Community Participation and Equity in Access

アフリカにおける再生可能エネルギーへの移行とエネルギー正義：コミュニティ参加とアクセスの公平性 (AI 翻訳)

Winner Minah-Eeba, Collins Iyaminapu Iyoloma, Tamunotonye Sotonye Ibanibo

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-07#エネルギー転換Origin: Global
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20064421
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20064421

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、南アフリカ、ケニア、ナイジェリアの再生可能エネルギー事業がエネルギー正義の原則（分配的・手続き的・認識的正義）にどの程度沿っているかを質的比較ケーススタディで分析。ケニアの分散型システムは包摂的参加を促進する一方、南アフリカのトップダウン型移行は一部コミュニティを疎外。ナイジェリアでは地域の関与が最小限で正義の欠如が顕著。女性や先住民などの脆弱層が除外される傾向が全事例で確認された。

English

This qualitative comparative case study examines how renewable energy projects in South Africa, Kenya, and Nigeria adhere to energy justice principles (distributive, procedural, recognition). Kenya's decentralized systems promote inclusive participation, while South Africa's top-down transition marginalizes communities. Nigeria shows minimal local engagement and significant justice deficits. Vulnerable groups are often excluded across all cases.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では再生可能エネルギー導入に伴う地域との軋轢や公平性の問題が顕在化しており、本論文の包摂的参加や利益共有の枠組みは示唆に富む。ただし直接的なGX制度（SSBJ等）との関連は薄い。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global debates on energy justice by providing empirical evidence from Africa. It highlights how procedural and distributive justice are often neglected in transition policies, relevant for just transition frameworks under CSRD or ISSB social considerations.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for studying energy justice across different governance contexts.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights on community engagement and equitable benefit sharing for renewable project developers.

🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes need for justice-led energy planning to avoid marginalization of vulnerable groups.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Climate vulnerability, developmental inequality, and ongoing energy poverty are all factors influencing Africa's transition to renewable energy. More than 600 million people in sub-Saharan Africa do not have access to electricity, despite the region's wealth of solar and wind resources. Africa needs a greater emphasis on energy justice, which includes distributive (equitable access and burden sharing), procedural (inclusive decision-making) and recognition (respect for marginalized identities) justice, even though global energy transition narratives place a strong emphasis on decarbonisation. This study investigates how renewable energy projects in South Africa, Kenya, and Nigeria adhere to energy justice principles. 15 semi-structured interviews, policy analysis, and NGO reports were used in a qualitative comparative case study approach. Stakeholder comparison and coding were done using NVivo 14 software. Findings show Kenya’s decentralized energy systems support more inclusive participation, while South Africa’s top-down transition marginalizes some communities. Nigeria presents the most challenges, with minimal local engagement and significant justice deficits. Vulnerable groups such as women, youth, and indigenous populations are often excluded across all cases. The study concludes that embedding energy justice in planning and governance is essential for a sustainable, inclusive African energy transition. Policy recommendations emphasize community participation, equitable benefit sharing, and justice-led energy frameworks.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。