Between Forests and Carbon Trading: AMAN’s Efforts in Advancing Indigenous Rights in Indonesia
Muhammad Arief Virgy
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、インドネシアの先住民組織AMANが森林炭素取引政策に挑戦し、先住民の権利を推進するために用いた戦略を分析。政策起業家のレンズを通して、法的・空間的証拠の生成、司法審査の追求、議員への働きかけ、選挙戦略などの手法を検討。しかし、寡頭的な議会や行政の異なる開発観、閉鎖的な司法制度により、その影響力は制限された。
English
This article analyzes how AMAN, Indonesia's largest indigenous organization, challenged forest carbon trade policy to advance indigenous rights. Using policy entrepreneurship theory, it examines strategies like producing legal and spatial evidence, judicial review, legislative engagement, and electoral tactics. Barriers included an oligarchic parliament, executive mindset differences, and closed judiciary.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、先住民（アイヌ）の権利や森林炭素取引に関する政策議論が限定的であるため、直接的な示唆は少ない。ただし、気候政策における先住民の関与という観点で、日本の政策立案者にも参考となる可能性がある。
In the global GX context
This study contributes to global understanding of indigenous advocacy in climate policy, particularly carbon trading. It highlights structural barriers and the need for supportive policy venues, relevant for contexts like the EU and US where indigenous rights and carbon markets intersect.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers studying indigenous movements and climate policy can learn about AMAN's multifaceted strategies and barriers.
🏢実務担当者:Indigenous organizations and NGOs can gain insights into effective advocacy approaches and potential obstacles.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note the importance of inclusive policy venues and networks for transformative climate advocacy.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article explores how the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN), Indonesia’s most influential Indigenous organization, mobilized advocacy strategies to challenge Indonesia’s forest carbon trade policy and advance Indigenous rights. Using the lens of policy entrepreneurship, it examines how AMAN employed strategies such as producing legal and spatial evidence, pursuing judicial review, engaging legislators, and leveraging electoral strategies to revoke the forest carbon trade policy and push for the long-delayed Indigenous Peoples Rights Bill as a safeguard. Based on semi-structured interviews and document analysis, the study finds that its efforts were constrained nationally by an oligarchic parliament, a different development mindset of the executive branch, and a closed judicial system in the Supreme Court. These barriers not only limited AMAN’s influence but also exposed structural challenges facing an Indigenous organization in climate policy. The findings underscore that supportive policy venues and networks are essential for transformative advocacy.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801261444760first seen 2026-05-25 04:49:48 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:49:52
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。