← 論文一覧に戻る

Comparative Sustainability Assessment of Petroleum Epoxy Resin and Hybrid Bio-based Epoxy Systems Synthesized from Renewable and Waste-Derived Feedstocks

再生可能資源および廃棄物由来原料から合成された石油系エポキシ樹脂とハイブリッドバイオベースエポキシシステムの持続可能性比較評価 (AI 翻訳)

Sachin Ghimire, C. L. Gnawali

Tribhuvan University journal📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-30#その他経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.3126/tuj.v41i1.93711
原典: https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v41i1.93711
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

石油系エポキシ樹脂とバイオベースハイブリッドシステムの持続可能性を比較。廃棄物由来のバイオ炭や蜜蝋を組み込むことで、カーボンフットプリントの低減とVOC削減が可能であることを実証。統合的な指標(SMI)により、グリーン調達の判断を支援する。

English

This study compares petroleum-based epoxy with bio-based hybrid systems incorporating waste-derived biochar and beeswax. Results show reduced carbon footprint (10.40 to 9.30 kg CO2eq/kg) and 59% reduction in VOCs. A Sustainable Material Index (SMI) is proposed to aid green procurement in construction and coatings.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の建設業界ではグリーン調達基準が強化されており、本手法は材料選択の客観的指標として活用可能。特に、廃棄物由来原料の活用は循環経済政策と整合する。

In the global GX context

This work aligns with global trends toward low-carbon construction materials and circular economy. The proposed SMI offers a replicable framework for procurement decisions under tightening environmental regulations (e.g., EU taxonomy, green building certifications).

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Methodology for multi-metric sustainability assessment can be applied to other material systems and LCA studies.

🏢実務担当者:Procurement teams in construction and coatings can use the SMI to compare sustainable material options.

🏛政策担当者:The Waste Utilisation Index (WUI) could inform circular economy metrics in public procurement policies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Convetional epoxy resins derived from diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) carry a cradle-to-gate carbon footprint of 6.0–8.5 kg CO2-equivalent per kilogram, emit measurable concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during application and lack credible end-of-life recovery pathways. These drawbacks conflict increasingly with tightening environmental standards and the construction sector's transition toward circular material flows. The present study evaluates the sustainability credentials of four epoxy formulations within a single unified framework: a petroleum DGEBA benchmark (Sample P), a binary DGEBA–epoxidised soybean oil (ESO) blend (Sample PE) and two quaternary hybrid bio-based systems, one containing DGEBA, ESO and sugarcane bagasse biochar (Sample B), and a second further supplemented with beeswax (Sample BB). Bio-based carbon content was determined by stoichiometric mass-balance calculation in accordance with ASTM D6866, yielding values of 0%, 9.09%, 10.06%, and 10.46%, respectively. Volatile organic compound content was measured gravimetrically per ASTM D2369 as percent mass loss. Sample Metrics declined systematically from 8.53% (P) to 3.49% (BB), corresponding to a 59% reduction across the formulation series. Similarly, Cradle-to-gate carbon footprints were estimated by process-based allocation following ISO 14044 boundaries, sshowcaing decrease from 10.40 kg CO2eq/kg (P) to 9.30 kg CO2eq/kg (BB). Circular economy performance was expressed through a four-indicator Waste Utilisation Index (WUI) integrating renewable input fraction, waste-stream diversion, avoided fossil carbon and end-of-life valorisation potential. The Sample P yielded WUI = 0, while Sample BB attained WUI = 0.043, driven by the incorporation of waste-derived biochar and apicultural by-products. In the integrated Sustainable Material Index (SMI), which aggregates all four sustainability dimensions by equal-weight min–max normalisation, Sample BB scored 0.9896 against 0.5751 for Sample PE and 0.0000 for Sample P. These findings establish a reproducible multi-metric protocol directly applicable to green procurement decisions in construction and coatings industries.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。