シャリーアとマカシドの観点からの炭素取引：批判的分析

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Provides a novel framework linking Islamic jurisprudence to carbon market legitimacy.

🏢実務担当者:Offers guidance for Islamic financial institutions and firms in Muslim-majority contexts on carbon credit compliance.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for regulatory safeguards against greenwashing in carbon markets.

Purpose This study aims to critically evaluate the legality and impact of carbon trading from the perspective of property (mal) in Islamic law and maqasid al-sharīʿah. Design/methodology/approach The study follows a qualitative approach, using focus group discussions to collect primary data. It explores the theory of property and the concept of maqasid in Islamic law, drawing on classical fiqh sources and using a qualitative inductive approach. In addition, the study uses a thematic analysis technique to examine the qualitative data. Findings The study finds that carbon credits comply with the requirements of a property in Islamic law. In shariah, the sold object should be a valuable, desired and lawful asset recognised in custom. In addition, it should be owned, possessed and provide a halal benefit. Carbon credits meet all these criteria since they are issued and registered with a unique identifier, allowing them to be traded, transferred, owned and controlled by individuals. They are valuable and desired, as companies with unavoidable emissions are willing to pay the offset value of their emissions. In addition, carbon credits help reduce emissions, prevent deforestation, mitigate pollution and promote environmental sustainability. The study posits that carbon trading aligns with maqasid al-shariah because it contributes to environmental protection, thereby safeguarding all five essential maqasid of shariah. Carbon credits are not inherently harmful. Thus, it is not a valid argument to claim that carbon trading harms the environment, as any harm it may cause is insignificant compared to the benefits it provides. An Islamic legal maxim says, “A greater harm should be removed by tolerating a lesser harm.” The alleged harms of carbon offsetting are considered acceptable in the fight against climate change. Nonetheless, to prevent misuse and speculation in carbon trading, actions must be taken to curb greenwashing. Practical implications Carbon trading not only reduces emissions but also benefits broader society. It motivates towards sustainability and climate-friendly actions, including green investments, the development of green technology, increased renewable energy, the prevention of deforestation, and other carbon-absorbing projects. Originality/value This study is among the pioneering efforts to examine carbon trading from the perspectives of shariah and maqasid. It supports shariah scholars and other professionals in making decisions regarding projects that contribute to combating climate change. The study would encourage collaboration among shariah scholars, environmental experts and policymakers to create a sustainable atmosphere that aligns with Islamic values.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-07-2025-0449first seen 2026-09-04 05:02:49