自然気候解決策と植物侵入のフィードバック関係
Feedbacks between natural climate solutions and plant invasions (原題)
Evelyn M. Beaury, Jonathan M. Levine
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
自然気候解決策（NCS）と植物侵入の相互作用をレビューした論文。侵入種はNCSの迅速な実施を妨げ、炭素貯留の耐久性を低下させ得る一方、侵入が炭素貯留を増やす生物多様性とのトレードオフ事例もある。森林ではNCSが侵入への抵抗性を高め、NCSと侵入抑制の間に正のフィードバックが生じ得ることを示す。気候資金メカニズムを侵入対策に活用する必要性も指摘する。
English
This review examines how plant invasions and natural climate solutions (NCS) interact. Invasions can hinder rapid NCS implementation and reduce carbon storage durability, though some cases show increased carbon storage creating biodiversity-climate trade-offs. Several NCS, especially in forests, boost resistance to invasions, suggesting a positive feedback loop between NCS and invasion control. The authors call for sustained invasive species management funding within NCS projects.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では森林吸収源やJ-クレジットの森林管理事業が拡大しており、外来種管理を含む炭素貯留の耐久性・追加性の議論はSSBJや有報での自然関連開示（TNFD）とも接続し得る。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD and TNFD push nature-related disclosure, this paper flags that carbon-removal claims from land-based NCS depend on sustained invasive species management — a durability and integrity issue relevant to offset markets and nature-related financial disclosure.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:NCSの炭素貯留耐久性と生物多様性の相互作用を定量化する研究ギャップを示す。
🏢実務担当者:森林・農地系クレジット事業で外来種管理コストを炭素貯留の耐久性リスクとして組み込む根拠になる。
🏛政策担当者:森林吸収源政策やクレジット制度で外来種管理への資金配分を設計する際の論点を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Biological invasions and carbon sequestration guide many modern-day land management decisions. However, intersections between invasions and natural climate solutions (NCS) - actions to maintain or increase the land carbon sink - have not received adequate attention in either the invasion or climate mitigation literature. We therefore review how plant invasions affect NCS and vice versa, focusing on reductions in emissions and carbon removals associated with avoided habitat conversion, restoration, forest and cropland management, agroforestry, and optimal grazing. We find that plant invasions can interfere with rapid NCS implementation and reduce the durability of carbon storage in many systems, although there are cases in which invasive plants increase carbon storage, creating biodiversity-climate mitigation trade-offs. At the same time, studies find that several NCS increase community resistance/resilience to invasions, and do so in forests, in particular, which can suppress invasive species spread in these systems. These dynamics suggest a positive feedback loop between NCS and invasions, in which NCS facilitate invasion control, and successful invasion control, in turn, eases further NCS implementation. This feedback could accelerate gains in land-based carbon storage and generate co-benefits for biodiversity, provided that NCS projects receive resources for sustained invasive species management. We highlight areas in need of further research, including how financial mechanisms for climate action could be used to overcome invasion-induced implementation barriers.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aeb0b9first seen 2026-10-26 04:40:08 · last seen 2026-11-05 04:52:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。