← 論文一覧に戻る

回復生態系における土壌プロセスが有機炭素の蓄積と安定化を制御する

Restoration-driven soil processes regulating organic carbon accumulation and stabilization in restored ecosystems (原題)

Jyotirmay Roy, Suman Dutta, Subhajeet Sarkar, Subrata Gorain, Koushik Banerjee

Discover Soil.📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-31#気候科学Origin: Global対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.1007/s44378-026-00289-8
原典: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00289-8
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは2000年から2024年の文献を系統的に統合し、植林や放牧排除などの回復介入が土壌特性を変化させ、有機炭素の蓄積と安定化に寄与するメカニズムを解明した。特に、団粒形成や鉱物結合有機炭素が長期的な炭素隔離に重要であり、生態系の状況や回復年数が応答を左右する。

English

This systematic review synthesizes global literature (2000-2024) on how restoration interventions (afforestation, grazing exclusion, etc.) modify soil properties to enhance organic carbon accumulation and stabilization. It highlights the role of aggregate formation and mineral-associated organic carbon in long-term sequestration, noting context-dependence and trade-offs.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、2050年カーボンニュートラル目標に向けて、森林や農地の炭素貯留機能の評価が重要であり、本レビューの知見はJ-クレジット制度における土壌炭素貯留量の算定や、生態系回復プロジェクトの効果検証に活用できる。

In the global GX context

Globally, this review informs nature-based solutions and land-based carbon accounting under frameworks like the Paris Agreement and voluntary carbon markets. It provides mechanistic insights that can improve the accuracy of soil carbon models and guide restoration strategies for climate mitigation.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive synthesis of soil mechanisms for carbon sequestration, useful for refining carbon models and identifying research gaps.

🏢実務担当者:Offers evidence-based guidance for designing restoration projects to maximize carbon benefits, relevant for sustainability reporting and carbon credit projects.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of soil processes in restoration for climate policy, supporting the inclusion of soil carbon in national climate strategies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Abstract Land degradation severely undermines ecosystems’ capacity to function as carbon sinks, thereby accelerating atmospheric CO 2 accumulation and climate change. Despite a growing body of research on land restoration, the specific soil-based mechanisms driving long-term carbon sequestration across restoration strategies have not been synthesized systematically. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of global literature from 2000 to 2024, uncovering how key soil variables mediate carbon dynamics in restored ecosystems. This review synthesizes recent advances in understanding how restoration interventions regulate soil–carbon interactions across different ecosystems. Restoration practices via afforestation, grazing exclusion, land-use conversion, terracing, wetland rehabilitation, and peatland rewetting modify key soil properties, including bulk density, soil aggregation, texture distribution, pH, and microbial community composition. These changes influence soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics by increasing organic matter inputs from vegetation, improving soil structural stability, enhancing organo-mineral associations, and regulating microbial processing of organic carbon. In particular, the formation of stable aggregates and mineral-associated organic carbon plays a crucial role in long-term SOC stabilization. The magnitude and direction of SOC responses depend strongly on the ecosystem context, restoration age, soil mineralogy, and hydrological conditions. While restoration generally enhances SOC accumulation, trade-offs such as soil acidification or water availability constraints may influence long-term carbon sequestration outcomes. By integrating restoration pathways with soil physicochemical and biological mechanisms, this review highlights the central role of soil processes in determining the effectiveness of ecosystem restoration for climate mitigation and sustainable land management.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。