← 論文一覧に戻る

Social Class Targeting of Property Buyouts

不動産買収における社会的階級ターゲティング (AI 翻訳)

Megan Mullin

RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-01#その他
DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2026.12.4.11
原典: https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2026.12.4.11

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

気候ハザードによる不動産買収提案に対する米国自治体議員の反応を調査。低所得者向け買収への支持が高く、その差は検討後拡大した。階級格差が気候移住に影響する可能性を示唆。

English

A survey experiment on US local elected officials' support for climate-related property buyouts finds significantly greater support for low-income recipients than wealthy ones, even with identical cost recovery. The effect amplifies after considering pros and cons, potentially mitigating class-based disaster recovery disparities but also contributing to climate migration class divides.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の自治体でも気候リスク対応のための不動産買収が検討される可能性がある。公正な移行と社会的公平性の視点は、SSBJやTCFDの社会側面とも関連。

In the global GX context

Globally, this study highlights how political decisions on climate adaptation (buyouts) are influenced by recipient class, with implications for equitable disaster recovery and managed retreat policies under climate change.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides experimental evidence on political economy of climate adaptation, linking class and policy support.

🏢実務担当者:Local governments designing buyout programs should account for potential class bias in community engagement.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests that explicit class targeting in buyout policies can reduce inequality but may also affect migration patterns.

📄 Abstract(原文)

As local governments face the burden of responding to climate-related hazards, their actions layer on top of existing class inequalities. This article reports on a survey experiment examining the responses of elected city and county officials to a proposed voluntary buyout of properties at risk from climate impacts. An experiment embedded in the survey tests whether politicians’ responses to a buyout proposal depend on identification of recipients as wealthy or low-income. Results show a significant difference in support across the targeted recipients: even with an identical cost recovery period, elected officials were more likely to support buyouts for low-income homeowners. The effect of social class targeting became larger after respondents considered wide-ranging benefits and drawbacks of buyouts: they favored buyouts to a greater degree for low-income recipients, and to a lesser degree for wealthy recipients, than for homeowners not identified with a class marker. If these responses translate into differential provision of buyout opportunities across income groups, it could help mitigate large class-based disparities in capacity to recover from disasters, while at the same time contributing to class-based disparities in climate migration.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。