Blue vs blue: Competing visions of offshore renewables and ocean futures
ブルー対ブルー：海洋再生可能エネルギーと海洋の未来をめぐる競合ビジョン (AI 翻訳)
Larelle Bossi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、海洋再生可能エネルギーの急速な拡大がもたらす環境政治の新たな亀裂を「ブルー対ブルー」の視点から分析する。気候変動対策としての再生可能エネルギー推進と、海洋の生物多様性・文化的価値の保護という競合するビジョンの対立を描き出し、カーボン削減主義の倫理的リスクを指摘する。先住民コミュニティの価値観を統合した関係性に基づく政策を提言する。
English
This paper introduces a 'Blue vs Blue' lens to analyze conflicts between offshore renewable energy expansion and marine conservation. It critiques carbon reductionism and advocates for place-based stewardship integrating Indigenous and community values, offering pathways for blue-conscious policy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では洋上風力発電の導入が進む中、海洋の文化的・生態的価値との調和が課題となっている。本論文の「ブルー対ブルー」の枠組みは、日本の海洋政策や地域コミュニティとの対話に示唆を与える。特に、アイヌや琉球などの先住民族的視点を考慮する際に有用。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a critical framework for global offshore renewable debates, highlighting the ethical and cultural dimensions often overlooked in climate-centric policies. It is relevant for ISSB and other disclosure frameworks considering biodiversity and social impacts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a novel conceptual lens for studying conflicts in energy transition.
🏢実務担当者:Helps corporate sustainability teams anticipate community opposition and integrate cultural values.
🏛政策担当者:Informs marine spatial planning and renewable energy siting decisions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The rapid expansion of offshore renewable energy has exposed new fractures in environmental politics. While often cast as a Blue vs Green debate – global climate imperatives versus local marine conservation – this framing may not go far enough. A more accurate lens is Blue vs Blue: a contest between competing visions of the ocean’s future. On one side lies the Green agenda, advancing offshore renewables for climate mitigation but rebranded as “blue.” On the other lie truly blue priorities: protecting biodiversity, respecting cultural sovereignty, and pursuing regenerative technologies. This paper situates the debate within the broader “Blue Economy” discourse, highlighting how ecological, cultural, and ethical attachments complicate the rollout of industrial-scale renewables. Ultimately, the question is whether oceans will be governed primarily as carbon sinks for global mitigation, or as relational spaces demanding protection, regeneration, and stewardship. • Introduces a “Blue vs Blue” lens showing conflict between climate goals and marine cultural–ecological values. • Shows oceans carry deep relational, cultural, and psychological meaning beyond carbon metrics. • Identifies ethical risks of carbon reductionism in offshore renewable expansion. • Advances a relational, place-based ethics integrating First Nations and community values. • Offers pathways for blue-conscious policy to align renewables with marine stewardship.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104401first seen 2026-06-07 04:36:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。