← 論文一覧に戻る

欧州連合における海事脱炭素化のための代替燃料インフラの規制要因

Regulatory Drivers of Alternative Fuel Infrastructure for Maritime Decarbonization in the European Union (原題)

Grekos D

Research Squareプレプリント2026-09-07#エネルギー転換Origin: EU経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: transport
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202609.0458.v1
原典: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202609.0458.v1

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、EUの規制枠組みが港湾における代替燃料インフラ投資に与える影響を、ピレウス港の事例を通じて分析。FuelEU Maritime、AFIR、EU ETS、TEN-Tの相互作用が投資を形成し、IMO交渉の不確実性も重要と指摘。統合的規制アーキテクチャの必要性を提唱。

English

This study analyzes how EU regulations shape investment in alternative fuel infrastructure for maritime decarbonization, using the Port of Piraeus as a case. It finds that the interaction of FuelEU Maritime, AFIR, EU ETS, and TEN-T drives investment, while IMO negotiations add uncertainty. An integrated regulatory architecture is essential.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、国際海運の脱炭素化に向けた規制対応が急務。本論文のEU規制分析は、日本の港湾政策や海運企業の戦略立案に示唆を与える。特に、SSBJ開示や投資家対応において、規制リスクとインフラ投資の関連を理解する上で有用。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global scholarship on maritime decarbonization by providing a framework to assess regulatory drivers of infrastructure investment. It highlights the interplay of EU instruments and IMO policy, offering insights for policymakers and port authorities worldwide.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured framework (RIAF) for analyzing regulatory impacts on infrastructure investment, useful for comparative studies.

🏢実務担当者:Helps shipping and port companies anticipate regulatory drivers and align investment strategies with EU and IMO policies.

🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence on how regulatory certainty and economic incentives can catalyze infrastructure deployment, informing policy design.

📄 Abstract（原文）

The decarbonization of maritime transport requires low- and zero-greenhouse-gas fuels together with timely deployment of supporting infrastructure in ports. This study examines how the European Union (EU) regulatory framework influences strategic investment in alternative fuel infrastructure under technological and market uncertainty. A qualitative research design combines documentary analysis of EU legislation, International Maritime Organization (IMO) policy, institutional reports and peer-reviewed literature with an illustrative case study of the Port of Piraeus. A Regulatory Infrastructure Assessment Framework (RIAF) is developed around four interrelated dimensions: regulatory certainty, economic incentives, technological neutrality and port governance. The findings show that infrastructure investment is shaped mainly by the interaction of complementary EU instruments, particularly FuelEU Maritime, the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation, the EU Emissions Trading System and the revised trans-European transport network framework. Continuing IMO negotiations in 2026 demonstrate that global regulatory uncertainty remains relevant to investment expectations. The Piraeus case further shows how EU regulation, finance, governance capacity and technological flexibility interact at port level. Effective maritime decarbonization therefore depends on an integrated regulatory architecture that aligns fuel demand, infrastructure supply, economic incentives and institutional implementation.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。