← 論文一覧に戻る

現代外皮材料の熱効率とカーボンフットプリントの比較分析

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE THERMAL EFFICIENCY AND CARBON FOOTPRINT OF MODERN ENVELOPE MATERIALS (原題)

A. Myronchuk

Modern construction and architecture📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-29#省エネ経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.31650/2786-6696-2026-17-55-64
原典: https://doi.org/10.31650/2786-6696-2026-17-55-64

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

建設分野の脱炭素化を背景に、断熱材・ALC・CLT・SIP等の外皮材料を熱伝導率とLCAベースの炭素フットプリントで比較した研究。木質系・バイオ系材料は炭素貯留により排出が最小、ALCとセラミックブロックは耐久性に優れるが断熱併用が必要と判明。総合的にALC+ロックウール断熱の複合構造が最もバランスが良いと結論づけている。

English

This study compares modern building envelope materials (mineral wool, EPS, aerated concrete, ceramic blocks, CLT, SIP, bio-based) on thermal efficiency and life-cycle carbon footprint. Wood-based and bio-composite materials show the lowest embodied carbon due to renewable feedstock and biogenic carbon storage, while aerated concrete and ceramic blocks need added insulation to meet thermal standards. Combined systems, notably aerated concrete with mineral wool, offer the best balance of efficiency, durability, and environmental performance.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では建築物省エネ法や住宅・建築物の脱炭素化、LCAに基づく建材選択が関心を集める。本稿は外皮材料の炭素と熱性能のトレードオフを整理する実務的視点を提供し、ZEB・長期優良住宅の材料選定に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, embodied carbon in construction is increasingly targeted by CSRD, green building certification (LEED/BREEAM), and whole-life carbon regulation. This paper adds a comparative material-level LCA perspective relevant to low-carbon building standards, though its regulatory basis is Ukraine-specific.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:建材の熱性能とLCA炭素を統合評価する比較枠組みの一事例として参照可能。

🏢実務担当者:外皮材料選定で断熱性能とエンボディドカーボンを両立させる複合構造の判断材料になる。

🏛政策担当者:建材の炭素表示や省エネ基準改定において、熱性能偏重でない複合評価の必要性を示唆。

📄 Abstract(原文)

The modern construction sector remains one of the largest consumers of energy resources and a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions. Due to the increasing requirements for building energy efficiency and the need for decarbonization of the construction industry, the selection of envelope materials capable of providing not only high thermal protection but also minimal environmental impact throughout the entire life cycle has become especially relevant. Under current conditions, the assessment of materials can no longer be based solely on thermal conductivity, as approaches related to embodied carbon and operational emissions of buildings are becoming increasingly widespread. The purpose of this article is to provide a comparative assessment of the thermal efficiency and carbon footprint of modern envelope materials in order to determine their suitability for energy-efficient and low-carbon construction. The study analyzes mineral wool, polystyrene foam, aerated concrete, ceramic blocks, CLT structures, SIP panels, and bio-based materials. The research was carried out using comparative analysis, thermal engineering calculations, and the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. The study considered thermal conductivity, thermal resistance, durability, embodied carbon levels, and the influence of materials on reducing the operational energy consumption of buildings. The regulatory framework of the study was based on the provisions of DBN V.2.6-31:2021 concerning the energy efficiency of buildings. The analysis revealed that the lowest thermal conductivity values are characteristic of polymer insulation materials and mineral wool, which provide a high level of thermal protection with relatively small layer thicknesses. At the same time, these materials differ significantly in terms of carbon impact due to the specifics of production processes and the origin of raw materials. It was determined that wood-based materials and biocomposites have the lowest carbon footprint because of the use of renewable raw materials and their ability to store biogenic carbon. Aerated concrete and ceramic blocks demonstrate stable durability and structural reliability; however, to meet modern thermal protection standards, they require combination with effective insulation materials. The results indicate that the assessment of envelope materials cannot be limited only to thermal conductivity. For example, an aerated concrete wall with an additional insulation layer may provide a better balance between thermal protection, durability, and fire safety than a single-layer structure. Similarly, CLT systems combined with bio-based insulation are characterized by lower embodied carbon levels but require additional moisture protection and careful detailing of joints and connections. It was established that the most balanced solution in terms of energy efficiency, durability, and environmental performance is represented by combined structural systems, particularly the combination of aerated concrete with mineral wool insulation. The obtained results confirm that the assessment of modern envelope materials should be based on a comprehensive approach that considers not only thermal properties but also carbon footprint, durability, reuses potential, and the impact of materials on the operational energy consumption of buildings. A promising direction for the development of energy-efficient construction is the implementation of low-carbon and bio-based materials combined with optimized structural solutions and modern approaches to the life cycle assessment of construction products.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。