複雑性を乗り越え、気候変動に対処する技術革新を推進する
Navigating complexity to drive technological innovation to address climate change (原題)
Juwairia. R. Quazi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
英国の気候技術企業13社のリーダーへのインタビューに基づき、気候変動対策の技術革新を推進するリーダーシップの実践を探求。システム思考と複雑性理論を用い、価値観、協働、データ駆動の研究開発、倫理的資金調達、エコシステム形成など7つのテーマを抽出。複雑適応系としてのダイナミックなフィードバックループが継続的革新とレジリエンスを生むと結論。
English
Based on interviews with 13 UK climate technology leaders, this qualitative study explores how leadership drives technological innovation for climate mitigation and adaptation. Using systems thinking and complexity theory, it identifies seven themes including values, collaboration, data-driven R&D, ethical financing, and ecosystem building. Findings support a complexity-based model where feedback loops foster continuous innovation and resilience.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX分野では、技術開発だけでなくリーダーシップと組織変革が重要。SSBJ開示や移行計画策定において、複雑性を踏まえた長期的視点とステークホルダー協働の示唆は、日本企業の経営層にも参考になる。
In the global GX context
Globally, this research contributes to understanding how climate technology leaders navigate complexity, complementing technical and policy-focused GX literature. It offers insights for corporate strategy and leadership development in the context of climate innovation, relevant to ISSB-aligned transition planning and net-zero commitments.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a qualitative framework for studying climate innovation leadership, useful for further research on organizational dynamics in GX.
🏢実務担当者:Offers practical themes and strategies for leaders in climate tech firms to foster innovation and resilience.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of ecosystem facilitation and ethical financing, informing policies that support climate innovation.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Climate technology innovation encompasses the development and application of products, business models, services, and technologies designed to mitigate climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and enhance sustainability. This PhD research investigates the central question: How do leaders of climate technology businesses in the United Kingdom drive technological innovation to address climate change? This research draws on systems thinking, which focuses on organisations as dynamic systems, examines feedback loops, and fosters a desire to build long-term learning and resilience within organisations. Alongside systems thinking, I use complexity theory to interrogate how leaders navigate complex contexts and foster technological innovation for both mitigation and adaptation. RESEARCH AIM: To examine how leaders of climate technology businesses in the United Kingdom drive technological innovation to address climate change. Specific Objectives 1. To identify the primary challenges and complexities faced by leaders in managing technological innovation for climate change mitigation and adaptation. 2. To examine how leaders utilise complexity theory and systems thinking to address uncertainty, interdependence, and unforeseen changes within innovation processes. 3. To identify and evaluate leadership strategies, behaviours, and practices that facilitate technological innovation in climate-related contexts. 4. To assess how leadership enables the integration of scientific knowledge, policy, and the practical application of climate innovations. 5. To propose recommendations that could enable leaders to more effectively promote innovation for climate change mitigation and adaptation. METHODOLOGY: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 13 climate-technology leaders were conducted over a period of one year. RESULTS: Effective leaders deliberately shift away from linear, profit-oriented models. Instead, they manage organized complexity through seven interrelated themes: (a) Commitment to strong values and purpose, including equity, stewardship, and long-term thinking. (b) Collaboration with stakeholders and the development of strategic partnerships, (c) Implementation of data-driven research and development that emphasizes incremental achievements and scientific rigor, (d) Active resistance to funding pressures that are misaligned with organisational values and avoidance of greenwashing through the adoption of ethical financing, (e) Active facilitation of ecosystem networks that bridge academia, industry, and policy, (f) Interdisciplinary integration of biology, social sciences, and systems thinking, and (g) Ensuring that founders possess experience and expertise aligned with the markets they serve. These themes generate dynamic feedback loops that are characteristic of complex adaptive systems. This process fosters continuous innovation and resilience, rather than simple mechanical optimization. The findings support a complexity-based model of climate technology leadership, in which human values, collaboration, and learning enable founders to transform multiple challenges into positive environmental outcomes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.7488/era/7506first seen 2026-08-20 04:34:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。