ライフサイクルアセスメント（LCA）の再調整：パーム油とグローバルサウスのための開発正義フレームワーク
Rebalancing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Development-Just Framework for Palm Oil and the Global South (原題)
Loso Judijanto
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、LCAの方法論的選択が南北間で負担と便益を不均等に分配しうると指摘し、インドネシアのパーム油を事例に開発ブラインドな実践を批判する。開発正義に基づくLCAフレームワークを提案し、データ主権、対称的なシステム境界、分配影響の報告などを通じて、小農への過重な負担を軽減し、科学的信頼性と政策正当性を高めることを目指す。
English
This paper argues that methodological choices in LCA can unevenly distribute burdens and benefits between the Global North and South, using Indonesian palm oil as a case. It critiques development-blind practices and proposes a Development-Just LCA framework emphasizing data sovereignty, symmetric system boundaries, and distributional impact reporting to reduce disproportionate burdens on smallholders and enhance scientific credibility and policy legitimacy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業はパーム油サプライチェーンでLCAや認証を活用しており、本フレームワークは調達先の小農支援やScope 3算定の公平性向上に示唆を与える。SSBJ開示でのサプライチェーン排出算定の質を高める上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on carbon accounting and supply chain disclosure by highlighting how LCA choices can disadvantage producer countries. It offers a framework that could inform ISSB-aligned Scope 3 accounting and certification schemes, promoting fairer and more credible sustainability assessments.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:LCA方法論の公平性と開発正義の視点を組み込む研究に示唆。
🏢実務担当者:パーム油調達企業は小農支援と排出算定の公平性向上に活用可能。
🏛政策担当者:国際的な炭素会計基準や認証制度の設計に開発正義の考慮を促す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is indispensable for identifying environmental hotspots, improving production systems, and supporting credible climate action. Yet its results are never independent of choices about system boundaries, data, allocation, temporal horizons, land-use history, and responsibility. This article develops a qualitative literature review of how those choices can distribute burdens and benefits unevenly between the Global North and the Global South, using Indonesian palm oil as an analytically revealing case. The review synthesizes recent scholarship on LCA methodology, life cycle sustainability assessment, climate justice, carbon accounting, palm-oil production, certification, and smallholder livelihoods. It finds that current practice can become development-blind when global databases inadequately represent tropical systems, historical land-use emissions are applied without contextual differentiation, producer-country mitigation is absorbed into downstream claims, and social or developmental functions are treated as external to the assessment. The article does not argue for weaker environmental standards or preferential treatment for palm oil. Instead, it proposes a Development-Just LCA framework built on procedural co-governance, local data sovereignty, geographical and temporal representativeness, symmetric system boundaries, transparent uncertainty, coherent treatment of national and product claims, distributional incidence reporting, and safeguards for the right to development. Applied to Indonesian palm oil, the framework would distinguish expansion from replanting, recognize methane avoidance and productivity improvement, and reduce disproportionate compliance burdens on smallholders. A fairer LCA would improve scientific credibility, policy legitimacy, and environmental effectiveness by making global sustainability assessment more representative, contestable, and accountable.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.47363/jeesr/2026(8)302first seen 2026-09-08 04:36:29
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。