gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Current Options and Future Trends in Green Fuels Storage

グリーン燃料貯蔵の現在の選択肢と将来の動向 (AI 翻訳)

Muhammad Anas Maqbool, Md Jahir Rizvi, Y. Lee, Pablo Borja Rosales

Energies📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-07#水素Origin: Global
DOI: 10.3390/en19102256
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102256

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、グリーン水素とグリーンアンモニアの貯蔵技術について、安全性、効率性、コスト面から批判的に検討。文献計量分析とSWOT、多基準評価を組み合わせ、両者の優位性を比較。技術的課題と将来の研究優先事項を特定している。

English

This review critically examines storage options for green hydrogen and green ammonia, combining bibliometric analysis with a risk-mitigation framework and SWOT analysis. It identifies technical bottlenecks and future research priorities, offering a multicriteria evaluation to guide optimal storage selection.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本は水素・アンモニアをGXの柱として推進中。本レビューは貯蔵技術の課題と選択基準を整理しており、関連企業や研究者にとって参考になる。

In the global GX context

Globally, green hydrogen and ammonia are key to decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors. This review provides a structured comparison of storage options, informing technology deployment and policy support.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a systematic framework for comparing hydrogen and ammonia storage, highlighting research gaps.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a decision-support tool using SWOT and multicriteria analysis for selecting storage solutions.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for standardization and techno-economic assessment in green fuel storage infrastructure.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The global transition to renewable energy underscores the urgent need for safe, efficient, and cost-effective storage solutions for green hydrogen and green ammonia. This review critically examines their fundamental characteristics and unique behaviours, emphasising storage, handling, and integration engineering challenges. To identify the influential studies, knowledge gaps and future trends in the research area, a systematic Scopus-based bibliometric and data analysis is conducted. A novel approach is adopted to identify the better green energy storage option between green hydrogen storage and green ammonia storage, combining a risk-mitigation assessment framework, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) analysis, and a multicriteria taxonomy based on the properties and behaviour of hydrogen and ammonia. This study also analysed and reviewed the performance of the hydrogen and ammonia storage system across technical, thermomechanical, safety/risk and economic dimensions. This review further addresses the limitations in technological bottlenecks, unresolved safety concerns and current simulation approaches to evaluate the performance of green hydrogen and green ammonia. The identified limitations open doors to future research priorities in this research area, including the techno-economic viability, standardisation, and modelling accuracy of hydrogen and ammonia storage systems. The evaluation presented by this study allows for precise identification of suitable energy storage based upon various operational and economic contexts.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。