パリ協定後の国家移行政策枠組みとしてのグリーンディール再考
Reconsidering Green Deals as national transition policy frameworks after the Paris Agreement (原題)
Khoi Hoang Nguyen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、パリ協定後の低炭素開発政策（LCDP）を「グリーンディール」というラベルを超えて比較するためのウェーバー的理想型を構築する。変革目標・誘導手段・国際的アンカリングの3属性で、世界33の国家・EU政策を半系統的レビューで分類。国際的アンカリングを国内移行政策の比較次元として理論化した点が貢献。
English
This study reframes 'Green Deals' as instances of a broader class of low-carbon development policies (LCDPs) and builds a Weberian ideal type based on three governance attributes: transformational objectives, steering instruments, and international anchoring. Applying it via a semi-systematic review of 33 national and EU-level policies, it theorizes international anchoring as a comparative governance dimension and enables equal-basis comparison of post-Paris transition policies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX推進法・GX経済移行債やSSBJ基準策定など、脱炭素と産業競争力を両立する国家戦略が進行中。本枠組みは日本のGX政策を国際的アンカリング（TCFD/ISSB対応等）の観点から位置づけ、他国比較に活用できる。
In the global GX context
As post-Paris governance fragments across the EU Green Deal, Korea's Green New Deal, and national transition plans, this framework helps global disclosure scholars and policymakers compare domestic decarbonization strategies on equal analytical footing, especially regarding how international anchoring (e.g., TCFD/ISSB alignment) shapes national policy design.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:比較政治経済・移行ガバナンス研究において、グリーンディールを超えたLCDP類型論と国際的アンカリング概念を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:自社の移行戦略が各国のLCDP枠組みや国際的アンカリング（TCFD/ISSB等）とどう整合するかを評価する視点を得られる。
🏛政策担当者:国内移行政策を国際的アンカリングの5形態で整理し、政策設計・比較評価に活用できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Long-term national policies jointly advancing decarbonization and socioeconomic development have become prominent features of the post-Paris Agreement governance landscape. Existing research has focused disproportionately on initiatives labeled as “Green Deals” while potentially overlooking a broader shift in sustainability transition governance. This study argues that “Green Deals” are better understood as instances of a broader class of low-carbon development policies (LCDPs). It develops a Weberian ideal type for identifying and comparing them, based on three governance attributes treated as analytically consequential by the scholarship on earlier sustainability transition governance policy approaches: transformational objectives, steering instruments, and international anchoring. The two extant Green Deals - the European Green Deal and the Korean Green New Deal - supply the empirical material from which these attributes are accentuated into their fully developed form. A semi-systematic literature review applies this ideal type to a globally diverse sample of 33 national and EU-level policies across diverse regions and politico-economic systems. The review establishes international anchoring as a comparative dimension of domestic transition policies, comprising five institutional forms that are climate-oriented, mixed, or non-climate in purpose. Each policy is ranked on all three attributes according to how closely it approximates the ideal type, yielding an overall classification of the reviewed cases. The study contributes a framework to identify and compare post-Paris sustainability transition policies beyond the “Green Deal” label, theorizes international anchoring as a governance feature rather than background context, and provides a basis for comparing diverse cases on an equal analytical basis.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04783-5first seen 2026-10-16 04:44:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。