Market Access Is Not Compliance: The EU-Brazil Supplier Evidence Gap under CSDDD, CBAM, EUDR and the EU-Mercosur Agreement
市場アクセスはコンプライアンスではない：CSDDD、CBAM、EUDRおよびEU-Mercosur協定下でのEU-ブラジルサプライヤー証拠ギャップ (AI 翻訳)
Villanova, Marcio
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、CSDDD、CBAM、EUDRなどのEU規制に直面するブラジル企業向けに、EU市場へのアクセスが自動的にコンプライアンスを意味しないことを指摘し、監査可能な証拠の整備フレームワークを提案する。特に、原産地、トレーサビリティ、排出量、デュー・デリジェンスなどの観点から、サプライヤーが欧州の規制要件を満たすための具体的な戦略を示す。
English
This paper addresses the supplier evidence gap for Brazilian companies under EU regulations (CSDDD, CBAM, EUDR). It argues that market access does not guarantee compliance and introduces a framework for building defensible evidence on origin, emissions, and due diligence. The analysis provides strategic guidance for CFOs, boards, and procurement teams facing EU-facing supply chains.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
EUのサプライチェーン規制が強化される中、日本の輸出企業やサプライヤーも同様の課題に直面する可能性がある。本フレームワークは、日本企業がEU市場向けの証拠整備を検討する際の参考となる。
In the global GX context
As EU regulations (CSDDD, CBAM, EUDR) tighten, global suppliers must move beyond market access to robust compliance evidence. This framework offers a structured approach for any non-EU supplier, including those in Japan, to align with European requirements and avoid exclusion from value chains.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework for supplier evidence defensibility applicable to cross-border regulatory compliance studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers actionable guidance for corporate sustainability and procurement teams to build audit-grade evidence for EU regulations.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the compliance gap for non-EU suppliers, informing trade policy and capacity-building initiatives.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This technical paper examines the supplier evidence gap faced by Brazilian companies exposed to European value chains under the EU-Mercosur trade architecture, CSDDD/CS3D, CBAM, EUDR, CSRD/ESRS and related buyer-readiness pressures. The central thesis is that market access does not automatically create supplier eligibility. Brazilian suppliers may become more commercially visible under EU-Mercosur trade expansion while remaining vulnerable to exclusion, delay, price pressure or contractual friction if they cannot provide audit-grade, buyer-readable evidence on origin, traceability, emissions, deforestation risk, due diligence, waste, reverse logistics, ITAD and governance controls. The paper introduces the EU-Brazil Supplier Evidence Defensibility Framework, a structured approach for converting Brazilian operational execution into European regulatory defensibility. It is designed for CFOs, boards, procurement teams, compliance functions, exporters, industrial suppliers and companies exposed to EU-facing supply chains. The analysis is technical and strategic. It does not constitute legal, tax, customs, financial, investment or audit advice. It does not promise legal compliance, buyer approval, avoidance of sanctions or risk elimination. Its purpose is to support regulatory risk interpretation, evidence architecture, supplier-readiness analysis and board-level decision-making.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/20346263first seen 2026-05-23 04:13:00 · last seen 2026-05-27 04:14:01
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。