A critical review of carbon emission mitigation, carbon sink expansion, and leveraging ecosystem services.
炭素排出削減、炭素吸収源拡大、生態系サービスの活用に関する批判的レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Qingshan Li, Lele Zhang, Lei Zhao, Jiaoting Peng
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、排出削減、吸収源拡大、生態系サービスという3つの柱を統合的に分析。再生可能エネルギーや電化、自然・工学的手法による吸収源の組み合わせで排出量50%以上削減可能とし、パリ目標達成には統合的展開が必須と結論付ける。
English
This critical review integrates carbon mitigation, sink expansion, and ecosystem services into a unified framework. It shows that sectoral decarbonization via renewables and electrification, combined with natural and engineered sinks (CCS, DAC, BECCS), can reduce emissions by over 50% and close the gap to Paris targets. The paper urges integrated deployment, policy coherence, and scaled investment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJや有報での気候関連開示が進む中、排出削減と吸収源の両面を考慮した戦略立案の参考となる。自然を基盤とした解決策は日本の森林・湿地保全政策とも連動し、統合的アプローチの重要性を示す。
In the global GX context
This review provides a global framework that aligns with TCFD/ISSB disclosure categories. It emphasizes that integrated deployment of mitigation, sinks, and ecosystem services is necessary to meet Paris targets, supporting transition finance and nature-based solutions in climate strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper offers a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge on mitigation, sinks, and ecosystem services, identifying research gaps and integration opportunities.
🏢実務担当者:Companies can use this framework to align decarbonization strategies with natural climate solutions and sink investments, informing Scope 1-3 reduction plans.
🏛政策担当者:The review provides actionable pathways for policy design that balance emission cuts, carbon removal, and ecosystem benefits, urging coherent policies and scaled investment.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Achieving climate stabilization requires integrating carbon emission mitigation, carbon sink expansion, and ecosystem service leveraging, yet information on their synergistic deployment remains fragmented. This study critically synthesizes current knowledge across these three pillars to provide a unified framework for transformative climate action. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature and international reports up to June 2024, the review analyzes sectoral emission patterns, mitigation technologies, sink capacities, and ecosystem-based interventions. Results indicate that widespread adoption of renewable energy, transport electrification, green building practices, regeneration, agriculture, and sustainable industrial processes can collectively reduce global carbon emissions by more than 50%. Natural sinks (forests, soils, wetlands, oceans) and engineered removal options, including carbon capture and storage, direct air capture, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, and biochar offer significant scalable potential, while ecosystem-based approaches, including reforestation, wetland restoration, and payment for ecosystem services, deliver additional sequestration alongside biodiversity conservation and enhanced resilience. This study suggests that only the integrated application of all three pillars provides a practical roadmap to close the gap between current trajectories and Paris Agreement targets, requiring urgent scaling through coherent policies, technological innovation, transparent monitoring, and strengthened international cooperation.Implications: This review critically synthesizes carbon emission mitigation, carbon sink expansion, and ecosystem service leveraging into a unified framework. It demonstrates that sectoral decarbonization through renewables and electrification combined with natural and engineered sinks can close the gap to Paris targets. The findings provide policymakers with actionable pathways to achieve net zero while securing co benefits for biodiversity and resilience. Critically, integrated deployment rather than isolated actions delivers the required scale and speed. This work advances climate policy design by balancing ecological sustainability with socioeconomic development, urging immediate cross sectoral cooperation and scaled investment in both technological and nature based solutions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2026.2651550first seen 2026-06-10 05:36:56 · last seen 2026-06-16 05:12:50
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。