Methods, Tools, and Processes for Participation in Just Energy Transitions: A Systematic Literature Review
公正なエネルギー移行における参加のための方法、ツール、プロセス：システマティック・レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Beste Gün Aslan, Patrícia Fortes, Nuno Videira
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、公正なエネルギー移行における参加の方法論的・概念的な役割に焦点を当てた42文献のシステマティックレビューである。分析の結果、参加はステークホルダーや政策立案者が多様な価値観や手続き的公正を考慮することを可能にするが、実際の実践には限界があることが明らかになった。審議型参加の方法論的実験や文脈に応じたガイドラインの必要性が示唆される。
English
This systematic review of 42 articles examines the role of participation in just energy transitions. Findings show that participation enables stakeholders and policymakers to incorporate plural values and procedural justice, but there is a gap between recognition and practice. The paper calls for methodological experimentation and context-sensitive guidelines.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもエネルギー移行に伴う地域社会への影響が注目されており、本レビューの知見は、日本の公正な移行プロセス設計に示唆を与える。ただし、日本の具体的な事例や政策文脈は扱っていない。
In the global GX context
This review provides a global synthesis of participatory methods in just transitions, relevant to international frameworks like the Just Transition Mechanism and IPCC discussions. It highlights the need for inclusive approaches that can inform practitioners worldwide, though it lacks region-specific case studies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The review maps current participatory methods and gaps, offering a foundation for future research on operationalizing justice in energy transitions.
🏢実務担当者:Energy practitioners can use the findings to design more inclusive participatory processes and identify areas where current practices fall short.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can draw on the review to integrate procedural justice into transition frameworks, though context-specific guidelines are needed.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Today, the transformation of energy systems is at the core of climate change mitigation. This transformation brings substantial implications for citizens. Coal-to-renewable energy transitions require new workforce skills while affecting regional economies and communities. Thus, a broader interdisciplinary approach integrating energy justice and participatory methods into energy transition research is required to clarify these sociotechnical transformations. To address this gap, this article conducts a systematic review of the just energy transition literature, focusing on studies where participation plays a methodological or conceptual role. Based on a systematic review of 42 articles, our findings show that participation enables stakeholders and policymakers to widen the energy policy discussion to account for plural values and procedural justice concerns of stakeholders involved in a complex socioecological system. This inquiry is timely, as energy practitioners, policymakers, and scholars increasingly seek to operationalize justice within energy transition frameworks. However, the review reveals a discrepancy between the widespread acknowledgment that just transition processes must be participatory and inclusive, and their limited realization in practice. These findings underscore the need for greater methodological experimentation with deliberative forms of participation, broader inclusion of stakeholder groups, and the development of context-sensitive guidelines to operationalize justice in energy transitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/en19092099first seen 2026-05-17 04:49:19
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。