キャンパスカーボンポイントから万人のカーボンインクルージョンへ：循環経済を促進する中古品取引のインセンティブメカニズムに関する考察—AP高校生調査
From Campus Carbon Points to Carbon Inclusion for All: Insights into Incentive Mechanisms for Second-Hand Trading in Promoting the Circular Economy—A Survey of AP High School Students (原題)
Zixi Zhou
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国のAP国際高校生48名へのアンケートで、中古品取引のインセンティブを分析。年間文房具支出は約1,536元、休眠品の元値は約784元だが87.5%が自宅に放置。売却意欲は高い一方購入意欲は低く需給の非対称が顕著。取引コストと品質・信頼が障壁で、「即時換金」と「統一プラットフォーム回収・再販」が最も支持された。カーボンポイントとサービス時間認定を組み合わせた仕組みを提案。
English
A survey of 48 AP high school students in China examines incentives for second-hand trading as part of circular economy and dual-carbon goals. Annual school-supply spending averaged CNY 1,536 with CNY 784 in idle items, yet 87.5% left items unused. Willingness to sell exceeded willingness to buy, revealing supply-demand asymmetry. Transaction costs and trust were key barriers; quick cash-out and platform-based resale were most attractive. The authors propose a campus carbon-points and service-hours incentive mechanism.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の双炭目標と循環経済を背景に、若年層のグリーン消費習慣形成とカーボンインクルージョンを論じる。日本ではカーボンポイントや環境教育、ESG人材育成の文脈で参考になるが、直接的なSSBJ・有報対応との接点は薄い。
In the global GX context
Situated in China's dual-carbon and circular economy agenda, this study links youth green consumption to carbon inclusion. It adds grassroots empirical evidence on incentive design for reuse markets, relevant to global circular-economy and Scope 3 waste-reduction discussions, though it does not engage TCFD/ISSB disclosure frameworks directly.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:若年層の循環経済行動とインセンティブ設計に関する小規模実証データを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:中古品回収・再販プラットフォームやカーボンポイント制度設計の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:カーボンインクルージョンと環境教育政策の設計に示唆を与える。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Establishing a waste recycling system is an important component of China’s dual-carbon goals, and second-hand trading is one of the links closest to daily life. Teenagers are both a major source of idle items and a key group for cultivating green consumption habits; however, empirical research on incentive mechanisms for campus second-hand trading remains limited. A questionnaire survey was conducted among students at an AP international high school, yielding 48 valid responses (items 8–10 were based on 46 responses collected at an earlier stage). The results show that: (1) the average annual spending on school supplies was about CNY 1,536 per capita and the original value of idle items was about CNY 784 per capita, yet 87.5% of the respondents left idle items "gathering dust at home" and only 12.5% had ever sold items through off-campus platforms, indicating a low-circulation path of "idling–discarding" that causes significant waste; (2) the mean willingness to sell was 3.63, with 47.9% of respondents showing strong willingness (a score of 4 or above), whereas the mean willingness to buy was only 2.96, revealing a marked supply–demand asymmetry; (3) the main barriers on the selling side were transaction costs ("too troublesome" 68.75%, "unsure how to price" 39.58%), while those on the buying side concerned quality and trust ("worry about outdated editions or broken calculators" 52.17%, "dislike of items used by others" 45.65%); and (4) regarding incentive preferences, "quick cash-out" (65.22%) and "unified platform collection and resale" (63.04%) were the most attractive options, whereas "campus carbon points/service hours" was less attractive on its own (21.74%) but showed considerable potential once linked to institutional resources. Accordingly, a "campus carbon points–service-hours accreditation" incentive mechanism is designed, and a three-level pathway of "campus–region–society" for promoting carbon inclusion is proposed, providing a reference for extending the circular economy from campus to society.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.62177/amit.v2i5.1780first seen 2026-10-16 04:52:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。