中国におけるCO2地中貯留:技術オプション、トレードオフ、炭素中立への経路に関するミニレビュー
CO2 geological storage in China: a mini review of technical options, trade-offs, and pathways toward carbon neutrality (原題)
Tianbiao Zhao
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、中国の炭素中立達成におけるCCUSの中心的役割を踏まえ、CO2地中貯留の技術的選択肢を工学的視点から体系的に比較する。深部塩水層、枯渇油ガス層、石炭層、玄武岩、頁岩、海底堆積物の6つの貯留タイプを技術・経済基準で評価し、4つのトラッピング機構の時間的進化と不確実性を分析する。また、CO2-EORの気候便益と政策ジレンマを考察し、今後の研究優先分野を提示する。
English
This review systematically compares CO2 geological storage options in China from an engineering perspective, evaluating six storage types (deep saline aquifers, depleted oil/gas reservoirs, coal seams, basalts, shales, marine sediments) using technical and economic criteria. It analyzes four trapping mechanisms, discusses monitoring technology trade-offs, and examines CO2-EOR's climate benefits and policy dilemmas, identifying five priority research areas for CCUS deployment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、CCUSはカーボンニュートラル実現の鍵として位置づけられ、政府も貯留ポテンシャル評価や実証事業を推進している。本レビューは中国の事例を中心とするが、貯留技術の選択基準やモニタリングのコスト・分解能トレードオフは、日本のCCUSプロジェクト(苫小牧など)にも応用可能な知見を提供する。
In the global GX context
Globally, CCUS is recognized as essential for meeting net-zero targets, with ISSB and other frameworks increasingly requiring disclosure of climate-related risks and transition plans. This review provides a comprehensive technical comparison of storage options and monitoring technologies, offering valuable insights for global CCUS deployment and policy development, particularly in regions with similar geological conditions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparison of storage types and trapping mechanisms, useful for identifying research gaps in CCUS engineering.
🏢実務担当者:Offers practical criteria for selecting storage sites and monitoring technologies, aiding in CCUS project planning and cost estimation.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights policy dilemmas around CO2-EOR and post-closure liability, informing regulatory frameworks for CCUS deployment.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is central to achieving carbon neutrality, with CO 2 geological storage serving as a key negative-emission pathway. Although extensive research has addressed storage mechanisms and monitoring tools, the site-specific applicability of these techniques and the trade-off between storage security and cost remain insufficiently constrained. This review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature, international databases, and Chinese field reports to assess recent technical progress from an engineering perspective focused on China. Six storage types are compared, namely, deep saline aquifers, depleted oil/gas reservoirs, coal seams, basalts, shales, and marine sediments, using technical and economic criteria. Four trapping mechanisms, including structural, residual, solubility, and mineral trapping, are analyzed in terms of their time-dependent evolution and uncertainty ranges, with particular emphasis on the reaction kinetics of supercritical versus dissolved CO 2 injection in basalt. For monitoring technologies, integrated systems are compared functionally, and the resolution-cost trade-offs that affect field deployment are discussed. The synergies and conflicts of CO 2 -enhanced oil recovery (CO 2 -EOR) are also examined, focusing on net climate benefit, lifecycle emissions, and the policy dilemma of producing additional hydrocarbons. Five priority areas are identified for future research, including multi-scale coupled simulation, intelligent monitoring networks, storage-utilization synergy optimization, marine storage pathway clarification, and post-closure liability frameworks. This review is intended to serve as a practical, technically grounded reference for CCUS engineering deployment in China.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2026.1873039first seen 2026-08-20 04:41:15
- scopus https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/105050247828first seen 2026-09-18 05:47:09 · last seen 2026-09-21 05:45:00
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。