← 論文一覧に戻る

Comparative Analysis of The Economic and Environmental Performance of Virgin and Recycled Polyester in Supporting The Transition from a Linear to a Circular Economy in The Indonesian Polyester Industry

バージンポリエステルとリサイクルポリエステルの経済的・環境的性能の比較分析:インドネシアのポリエステル産業における線形経済から循環経済への移行支援 (AI 翻訳)

Richo Erwansyah Mauland, Jagat Prirayani

Journal of social research📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-17#circular_economy経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: textiles
DOI: 10.55324/josr.v5i8.3295
原典: https://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr/article/download/3295/1992
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、インドネシアのポリエステル産業において、バージンPETとリサイクルPETの経済的・環境的性能を比較。リサイクルPETはエネルギー消費、GHG排出、水使用で優れるが、収益性ではバージンPETが優位。2025-2030年の予測ではリサイクルPETの成長可能性が高いとし、段階的なハイブリッド経済アプローチを提言。

English

This study compares virgin and recycled polyester in Indonesia's polyester industry. Recycled PET shows superior environmental performance (lower energy, GHG, water) but weaker economics. Projections for 2025-2030 indicate higher growth potential for recycled PET, driven by sustainability demands and regulation. A gradual hybrid economic approach is recommended for balancing competitiveness and sustainability.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のポリエステル産業やアパレル企業にとって、インドネシアのリサイクルPET動向はサプライチェーン上のScope3排出削減戦略に示唆を与える。また、日本でも循環経済政策が進む中、本分析は原材料調達の環境負荷評価に有用。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence on the trade-offs between virgin and recycled polyester, relevant for global apparel and textile supply chains under circular economy frameworks. It highlights regulatory and infrastructure barriers that are common in emerging economies, offering lessons for transition finance and ESG disclosure.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comparative case study for circular economy transition in a developing country context.

🏢実務担当者:Useful for sourcing decisions and sustainability reporting in textile supply chains.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights policy levers and infrastructure gaps needed to promote recycled materials.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The polyester industry in Indonesia has experienced significant growth under a linear economic model based on virgin polyethylene terephthalate (vPET), which relies heavily on fossil-based resources and contributes to high energy consumption, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water use, and waste generation. The transition toward recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) represents an important pathway for implementing circular economy principles and improving industrial sustainability. This study aims to compare the economic and environmental performance of vPET and rPET, evaluate future development trends, and identify strategic factors influencing the transition from a linear to a circular economy model in Indonesia’s polyester industry. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative comparative analysis, Simple Linear Regression (SLR) for projection analysis, and PESTEL analysis to assess external factors affecting rPET development. The results indicate that vPET maintains stronger economic performance in terms of production, revenue, and operating profit; however, rPET demonstrates superior environmental performance through substantially lower energy consumption, GHG emissions, and water usage. Projection results for 2025–2030 show that rPET has greater growth potential, supported by increasing sustainability demands, regulatory pressure, technological advancement, and ESG commitments. Nevertheless, challenges related to feedstock availability, recycling infrastructure, and investment requirements remain significant barriers. This study concludes that a gradual transition through a hybrid economic approach is the most feasible strategy, enabling Indonesia’s polyester industry to balance economic competitiveness with environmental sustainability while supporting circular economy implementation and net-zero emission targets.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。