Carbon Footprint Assessment of Rose Oil Production
ローズオイル生産のカーボンフットプリント評価 (AI 翻訳)
Selin Yardımcı Dogan, Sezen Coşkun, Mehmet Beyhan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は地中海地域のローズオイル施設のカーボンフットプリントを評価。総排出量は14.63 kgCO2-eq/kgで、天然ガスが55.71%を占めた。再生可能エネルギー導入や廃棄物の嫌気性消化など排出削減策を提案。
English
This study assesses the carbon footprint of a rose oil facility in the Mediterranean region, finding total emissions of 14.63 kgCO2-eq/kg, with natural gas as the dominant source (55.71%). It recommends renewable energy adoption and anaerobic digestion of rose residues to reduce emissions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の香料産業や農業加工業にとって、製品レベルのカーボンフットプリント算定の参考事例となる。ただし、日本国内の規制やSSBJとの直接的な関連性は低い。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a case study of product-level carbon footprinting for a specialty agricultural product, relevant for global disclosure frameworks like TCFD and ISSB seeking supply-chain emissions data.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:農業加工品のカーボンフットプリント算定方法論の参考となる。
🏢実務担当者:ローズオイルや類似農産品の生産者は、自社の排出ホットスポット特定に活用できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere are a primary driver of climate change. As energy production and consumption rise rapidly globally, enterprises must quantify their environmental impacts. This study assesses the carbon footprint of a rose oil facility located in the Mediterranean Region, including its production and transportation activities to the export destination. The total carbon footprint of the facility was calculated as 14.63 kgCO2-eq/kg; when the carbon sequestration effect of trees within the facility area was considered, this value was reduced to 14.08 kgCO2-eq/kg. The product specific carbon footprint was determined to be 32.22 kgCO2-eq/kg product. Natural gas was identified as the dominant emission source, accounting for 8.15 kgCO2-eq/kg (55.71%). The combined carbon footprint from natural gas and diesel amounted to 8.93 kgCO2-eq/kg, whereas electricity consumption contributed 0.15 kgCO2-eq/kg. Other sources, excluding wastewater, CO2 cylinders, transportation, and waste, were other carbon footprint contributions. To reduce emissions, the facility should adopt alternative renewable energy systems. Using rose residues in anaerobic reactors for electricity generation can also help with waste valorization and emission reduction. Minimizing indirect emissions from waste transportation and increasing the number of trees on-site are other recommended measures. Overall, carbon footprint mitigation is crucial for long-term sustainability strategies in the sector and mitigating climate change impacts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1938361first seen 2026-06-30 05:15:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。