← 論文一覧に戻る

EUタクソノミー第8条およびESRS基準に基づく環境開示の範囲と提示方法:ESG報告のデジタル化を背景として

The scope and presentation of selected environmental disclosures under article 8 of the EU Taxonomy and ESRS Standards in the context of ESG reporting digitalisation (原題)

Mariusz Karwowski

Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-16#開示インフラOrigin: EU経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: construction
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0055.8882
原典: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.8882

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

EUタクソノミー第8条とESRSに基づく環境開示について、EU建設・通信66社のサステナビリティ報告を内容分析した。エネルギー・GHG・水強度およびタクソノミーKPI(売上・CapEx・OpEx)の開示範囲と提示方法に大きなばらつきがあり、単位・乗数・詳細度が異なることを示す。建設業の方が通信業より開示頻度が高く、こうした非均一性は比較可能性とデジタル自動処理を妨げると指摘する。ESGデータ提示の標準化とデジタル報告タクソノミーの必要性を強調する。

English

Content analysis of sustainability reports from 66 EU construction and telecom firms examines environmental disclosures under ESRS and EU Taxonomy Article 8. Findings show wide variation in scope and presentation—units, multipliers, and detail—with construction disclosing more than telecom. This non-uniformity limits comparability and hinders automated digital processing, underscoring the need for standardised ESG data presentation and digital reporting taxonomies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

SSBJ基準・有報でのサステナビリティ開示が進む日本にとって、ESRSとEUタクソノミーKPIの実務的なばらつきとデジタル化課題は、XBRL/デジタルタクソノミー整備や開示データの比較可能性設計を検討する上で直接的な示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As ISSB/CSRD-aligned disclosure expands globally, this study provides empirical evidence on how inconsistent presentation of ESRS and EU Taxonomy KPIs undermines comparability and machine-readability—directly relevant to the digital taxonomy (XBRL) agenda and the push for structured, interoperable sustainability data.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:ESRS・タクソノミー開示の実証的なばらつきとデジタル処理可能性の関係を定量・定性両面で示す基礎資料。

🏢実務担当者:EUタクソノミーKPIやESRS環境指標の単位・乗数・詳細度を統一し、比較可能性と自動処理を意識した開示設計の必要性を学べる。

🏛政策担当者:ESGデータの標準化とデジタル報告タクソノミー整備の政策的必要性を裏付ける実証根拠として活用可能。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Purpose: The article identifies and assesses diversity in the extent and presentation of selected environmental disclosures specified in the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) and the indicators required under Article 8 of the EU Taxonomy, as reported in sustainability reports. The assessment also covers the implications of such diversity for data comparability and digital processing. Methodology/approach: The first part of the article discusses the regulatory framework of the European Union (EU) Taxonomy and ESRS standards based on a review of the literature and legal regulations, as well as the role of digitalisation in sustainability reporting. The empirical study is based on a content analysis of the sustainability reporting of 66 companies from the EU operating in the construction and telecommunications sectors. The analysis focuses on disclosures related to energy intensity, greenhouse gas emission intensity, water intensity, and EU Taxonomy key performance indicators (turnover, CapEx, and OpEx). Findings: The results reveal significant differences in both the extent of disclosures and the way they are presented. These differences relate mainly to the units of measurement, numerical multipliers, and the level of detail provided. Environmental disclosures under the ESRS and indicators resulting from Article 8 of the EU Taxonomy were disclosed more frequently in the construction sector than in the telecommunications sector. Non-uniform presentation of data may limit their comparability and hinder automated processing in a digital environment. Originality/value: The article provides empirical evidence on the degree of diversity in how companies present environmental disclosures under the ESRS and Article 8 indicators. The originality of the study lies in combining the analysis of the scope and presentation of environmental disclosures with an assessment of the implications of such diversity for digitalisation and the automated processing of ESG data. The findings highlight the need for further standardisation of ESG data presentation and the development of digital reporting taxonomies that support the comparability and automated processing of ESG data.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。