Comparative Implications of Decarbonization of Luxury: Emission Profile and Strategic Limitations
ラグジュアリーの脱炭素化の比較的含意：排出プロファイルと戦略的限界 (AI 翻訳)
Mohan Shi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、LVMH、ケリング、プラダ、リシュモンの4大ラグジュアリーコングロマリットの炭素排出構造と脱炭素計画をESG報告書やCDP開示に基づき比較。スコープ3排出が全体の68～90%を占め、収益成長と炭素強度の関係は企業により異なることを示した。サプライチェーン全体の排出削減には、許可型ブロックチェーンなどの透明性メカニズムやバイオベース素材の商業化が必要と提言。
English
This paper compares carbon footprint structures and decarbonization plans of four major luxury conglomerates (LVMH, Kering, Prada, Richemont) based on ESG reports and CDP disclosures (2019-2024). Scope 3 emissions account for 68-90% of total emissions, and the relationship between revenue growth and carbon intensity varies across firms. It recommends selective transparency mechanisms (e.g., permissioned blockchain) and commercialization of bio-based materials to address Scope 3 collective action problems.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業（特に高級ブランドやアパレル）にとって、スコープ3排出の開示と削減はSSBJ基準や有報での対応が急務。本論文はサプライチェーン全体の排出管理と透明性向上の具体策を示しており、日本企業のGX戦略立案に参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX discourse by analyzing Scope 3 emissions in the luxury sector, a high-value, low-volume industry often overlooked in climate disclosure research. It highlights the limitations of current ESG reporting and proposes innovative mechanisms (blockchain, bio-based materials) that could inform CSRD and CBAM implementation.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides comparative empirical evidence on decarbonization strategies and Scope 3 challenges in the luxury sector, useful for supply chain and ESG research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers actionable insights for luxury and fashion companies on managing Scope 3 emissions through transparency and technology adoption.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that regulations like CSRD and CBAM should be supplemented with transition support to avoid displacing suppliers in luxury supply chains.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The paper compares carbon footprint structures and decarbonization plans of the four most popular luxury conglomerates (LVMH, Kering, Prada, Richemont) based on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) reports. Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) disclosures, and financial reports (2019-2024). The main findings are as follows: (1) Carbon intensity( tCO2/e Million euros revenue) has a multifaceted connection with revenue growth: whereas LVMH and Prada recorded absolute decoupling (decrease of intensity with growth of revenues), Kering reported steadier increase in intensity using first-order volume scaling and not supply-chain innovation, corroborating H1 with reservations regarding its applicability to all corporations, and overriding H2; (2) Scope 3 emissions (encompassing 68%-90% of Decarbonization will need to implement selective transparency mechanisms (i.e. permissioned blockchain) as well as commercialization of high cost abatement technology (i.e. bio-based material) through high-end product lines with policy supportive supplier capacity building to deal with the collective action problems of Scope 3. The tools of regulation such as Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)/Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) should be supplemented with the transition support to avoid displacement of suppliers.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.gl27244first seen 2026-05-05 19:06:32
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。