← 論文一覧に戻る

カナダの炭素貯留に関する公開開示記録：アルバータ州登録台帳のセンサス、トン数系列、開示ファネル

Public disclosure record of Canadian carbon storage: Alberta registry census, tonnage series and disclosure funnel (原題)

Perazich, Milan

Zenodoデータセット2026-08-27#開示インフラ対象セクター: ccs
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22127065
原典: https://zenodo.org/records/22127065

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

カナダのCO2貯留に関する公開情報を体系的に整理。アルバータ州の規制当局が公開するモニタリング計画や年次報告を全数調査し、公開義務の根拠（法令・規則・通知・契約・慣行）を分類。公開が撤回されうる脆弱性や、非公開の内部文書の存在を指摘。

English

A systematic census of Canada's public CO2 storage disclosures, focusing on Alberta's regulatory documents. It classifies the legal bases for publication and identifies vulnerabilities where disclosure could be withdrawn, plus non-public instruments governing reporting.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のCCS事業では、貯留量の報告や開示の枠組みが整備途上。本稿の「開示ファネル」分析は、日本のCCS法や関連ガイドラインの設計に示唆を与える。特に、行政慣行に依存する開示の脆弱性は、日本の制度設計でも考慮すべき点。

In the global GX context

As global CCS scales up, transparent storage accounting is critical. This paper offers a rigorous method for auditing disclosure infrastructure, relevant to jurisdictions implementing CCS regulations and to ISSB/TCFD-aligned reporting on carbon removal.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:開示インフラの実証分析手法として、CCSの透明性研究に有用。

🏢実務担当者:CCS事業者は、報告義務の根拠と公開の脆弱性を理解し、リスク管理に活用できる。

🏛政策担当者:開示制度の設計において、法的根拠と行政慣行の違いが持つ意味を考慮すべき。

📄 Abstract（原文）

What Canada publishes about carbon dioxide storage, and what compels each publication. An executive summary with a dashboard and a list of gaps, then four series. A census of every monitoring, measurement and verification plan, closure plan and annual report on the Alberta Energy Regulator's Carbon Sequestration Project Reports page, with the Alberta knowledge sharing reports: the complete population, not a sample. Every published Canadian storage quantity traced to its source document, with the operator figure, the reporting basis and any inconsistency recorded. A disclosure funnel recording, instrument by instrument, what must be produced, who produces it and under what compulsion, who checks it, whether it is published, on what basis, and which instruments each row depends on. The instruments themselves, with citations, and whether each is publicly available. Publication rests on five bases: statute, rule, notice, contract and practice. They differ in how readily publication can be withdrawn, which is why they are separated. Alberta's storage documents are filed under rule but published as administrative practice, so that layer could be withdrawn without rulemaking. Two instruments governing disclosure are not themselves public: the ministerial order delegating oversight, and the federal template fixing the content of reports a statute requires to be published. Who generates a quantity and who publishes it are different questions, and a public record can fail on either. Compiled from primary Canadian government and operator documents. Swept 7 August 2026; registry re-enumerated 23 August; instruments table added 26 August; instrument keys and data origin added 27 August. No value is estimated; sources and access dates are recorded per series in the provenance sheet. No reported value differs from version 1. Supports the author's studies of measurement, verification and disclosure in carbon storage.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。