gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Industrial Symbiosis and Eco-Industrial Parks in the Era of ESG and Decarbonization: Assessment Methods, Regional Scaling, and Sectoral Evidence from 2000-2026

ESGと脱炭素化時代の産業共生とエコ産業パーク:2000-2026年の評価手法、地域スケーリング、セクターエビデンス (AI 翻訳)

Nasruddin ., Weni J.A. Musa, Marike Mahmud

International Journal of Research and Review📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-30#ESGOrigin: Global
DOI: 10.52403/ijrr.20260469
原典: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20260469

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、2000年から2026年にかけての産業共生(IS)とエコ産業パーク(EIP)に関する文献を統合し、ESG・脱炭素化との関連を評価。環境改善効果は強いが、前提条件に依存すること、評価が企業・フロー・パーク・地域の多層化へ移行していること、将来のEIPは廃棄物削減や炭素削減だけでなく、レジリエンスやガバナンス、社会的正当性で評価されることを示す。産業エコロジーとESGガバナンスを統合した新たな枠組みを提案。

English

This review synthesizes literature on industrial symbiosis (IS) and eco-industrial parks (EIPs) from 2000-2026 in the context of ESG and decarbonization. It finds that environmental improvements are strong but dependent on baselines and assumptions; assessment is moving from single-firm to multi-level (firm, flow, park, region); and future EIPs will be judged by resilience, governance, and legitimacy beyond waste and carbon savings. The paper proposes an integrated framework connecting industrial ecology with ESG governance and regional transition management.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではエコタウン事業など産業共生の実績があり、ESG開示や脱炭素政策が進む中、本レビューの多層評価枠組みは、企業・地域レベルでの産業共生の効果測定や投資判断に示唆を与える。特にSSBJや統合報告書での非財務情報開示において、産業共生の環境・社会・ガバナンス効果を定量化する際の参考となる。

In the global GX context

This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of industrial symbiosis and eco-industrial parks, linking them to ESG and decarbonization goals. It offers a framework that integrates industrial ecology metrics with governance and resilience, which is valuable for global policy discussions on circular economy and industrial decarbonization. The work is particularly relevant for regions implementing industrial park transformation programs and for disclosure frameworks requiring quantitative ESG performance evidence.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured review of IS/EIP literature with integration to ESG, identifying research gaps in multi-level assessment and governance.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a framework to evaluate industrial symbiosis projects from environmental, social, and governance perspectives, useful for corporate sustainability teams.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for governance and resilience criteria in eco-industrial park policies, supporting regional decarbonization strategies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Industrial symbiosis (IS) and eco-industrial parks (EIPs) have evolved from descriptive accounts of by-product exchange into a more demanding field centered on quantified performance, regional coordination, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) accountability. Building on the attached review base and newly added abstract corpus, this article synthesizes the field using only the provided materials, spanning foundational conceptual studies, bibliometric and systematic reviews, case-based life cycle assessment (LCA), hybrid and consequential models, network and regional planning studies, and recent work on uncertainty, optimization, and ESG-oriented decision support. Three findings dominate. First, evidence for environmental improvement is strong, but its magnitude depends on baselines, allocation, transport, substitution, and market assumptions. Second, the field is moving from isolated exchange evaluation toward multi-level assessment linking firm, flow, park, and regional outcomes. Third, the newest studies show that future EIPs will be judged not only by waste diversion and carbon savings, but also by resilience, governance quality, welfare, community legitimacy, and transparent investment prioritization. The review therefore proposes an updated framework connecting industrial ecology metrics with regional transition management and ESG governance, and argues that future research should focus less on whether symbiosis can work and more on when, for whom, at what scale, and under which governance arrangements it remains environmentally robust, socially legitimate, and economically actionable. Keywords: industrial symbiosis; eco-industrial parks; life cycle assessment; ESG; circular economy; decarbonization; regional industrial networks

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。