規制義務下での適応的サプライチェーン構築：ESGアンカー型サプライヤーガバナンスのためのハイブリッド・ファジィMCDMフレームワーク

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:規制開示データを適応的ガバナンスの情報基盤として再定義する理論的枠組みと、ファジィMCDMによる頑健な評価手法を提供する。

🏢実務担当者:BRSRのような規制開示データをサプライヤー選定・優先順位付けに活用する監査可能な意思決定ツールとして応用できる。

🏛政策担当者:開示義務が企業の適応能力とサプライチェーン強靭性を高めるメカニズムを示し、開示制度設計の根拠となりうる。

Organizations increasingly compete on their capacity to reconfigure operations quickly as regulatory, environmental and stakeholder conditions shift, making flexibility, adaptability and resilience central concerns of contemporary systems management. This study examines how mandatory environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure can be converted into an adaptive mechanism for governing the supply base under conditions of uncertainty. Focusing on India's Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) regime and the environmentally exposed pharmaceutical industry, the paper asks how regulated ESG data can help focal firms sense, prioritise and reconfigure their supplier portfolios towards more resilient and environmentally superior configurations. We develop a disclosure-anchored decision framework that treats assured BRSR filings as a standing information infrastructure, and we combine the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method to weight ESG criteria with Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank eight major listed Indian pharmaceutical firms across fourteen environmental and ESG sub-criteria. The findings show that environmental criteria dominate supplier prioritisation, with greenhouse-gas emission intensity and renewable-energy adoption emerging as the most decisive levers, while community-oriented criteria are comparatively marginal. The rankings remain stable across eight alternative weighting scenarios, indicating that the resulting supply-base configuration is robust rather than an artefact of a particular set of priorities. Theoretically, the study reframes a national disclosure mandate as a source of decision-making flexibility and adaptive capacity, integrating institutional, stakeholder, legitimacy and dynamic-capability perspectives to explain how disclosure pressure is transmitted upstream. Practically, it offers a transparent, replicable and audit-ready decision-support tool that links disclosure regulation to resilient supplier governance, contributing to the flexible systems management agenda on managing sustainability under uncertainty.

• openaire https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7274549first seen 2026-11-05 04:45:50