FINANCING SUSTAINABILITY: ASSESSING EU GREEN FINANCING INSTRUMENTS
持続可能性への資金調達：EUグリーンファイナンス手段の評価 (AI 翻訳)
Robertas Eismontas
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿はEUのLIFEクリーンエネルギー移行（CET）プログラムが中小企業（SME）のグリーン移行参加に与える影響を分析。リトアニアとドイツの比較研究（2021-2024年）により、ドイツでは多様なプロジェクトとSMEの積極的参加が見られる一方、リトアニアでは能力構築活動に限定されSMEの役割が間接的であることを明らかにした。EUのグリーン政策の効果は国の制度能力とイノベーション基盤に依存する。
English
This paper analyzes the EU LIFE Clean Energy Transition (CET) programme and its impact on SME participation in the green transition. Comparing Lithuania and Germany (2021-2024), it finds Germany has a larger, more diverse project portfolio with active SME involvement, while Lithuania's participation is limited to capacity-building. Results show EU green policy effectiveness depends on national institutional capacity and innovation infrastructure.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
EUのグリーン移行融資プログラムの比較分析は、日本が中小企業のグリーン化や地域間格差を考慮した政策設計を行う際の参考となる。特に、制度的能力やイノベーション基盤の重要性は、日本の地域別GX推進にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This comparative study of EU green financing instruments across two member states offers insights for global policymakers on how national institutional capacity and SME engagement shape transition finance outcomes. It contributes to the growing literature on effective implementation of green policy instruments.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical comparison of EU LIFE CET programme across two countries, highlighting institutional factors influencing SME participation in green transition.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for SMEs on how to engage with EU green financing programmes, and for programme administrators on design to improve SME involvement.
🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates that national capacity and innovation infrastructure critically affect the effectiveness of EU green policy instruments, informing future policy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This article analyses the role of the European Union’s LIFE Clean Energy Transition (CET) programme in shaping patterns of small and medium-size enterprise (SME) participation in the green transition. The study applies a comparative approach, examining CET projects implemented in Lithuania and Germany during the period 2021 to 2024. The analysis focuses on project distribution, funding volumes, institutional composition, thematic scope, and SME involvement. The findings reveal significant differences between the two countries. Germany demonstrates a larger and more diverse project portfolio, with SMEs actively participating in technologically oriented and governance-related initiatives. In contrast, Lithuania’s participation remains more limited, and is concentrated primarily in capacity-building activities, with SMEs playing a more indirect role. The results indicate that the effectiveness of EU green policy instruments depends on national institutional capacity, innovation infrastructure, and administrative experience. The study contributes to the literature by providing a comparative empirical analysis of the LIFE CET programme, and highlighting uneven outcomes of EU green policy implementation across Member States.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.15181/tbb.v96i1.2800first seen 2026-07-01 05:57:09
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。