Economic Sustainability Through Disclosure: Knowledge Management, Reporting Quality, and Corporate Performance in the Arab Gulf Region
開示による経済的持続可能性:アラブ湾岸地域における知識管理、報告品質、企業業績 (AI 翻訳)
Alessandra Theuma, Ahmad Faisal Hayek
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、アラブ湾岸諸国(GCC)の上場企業92社のデータを用い、持続可能性情報開示の量(ボリューム)と質(信頼性)が企業業績に与える影響を分析。開示量はROAやROEと正の相関がある一方、開示質の効果は弱く、シンボリックなコンプライアンスとしてのESG報告の実態が明らかになった。政策提言として、開示枠組みの調和や保証基準の義務化が挙げられる。
English
This study analyzes sustainability information disclosure among 92 listed firms in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) from 2020-2023, distinguishing between disclosure level (volume) and quality (credibility). Results show a positive association between disclosure volume and financial performance (ROA, ROE), but quality has weaker effects, suggesting symbolic compliance rather than substantive transformation. Policy implications include harmonized disclosure frameworks and mandatory assurance standards.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は中東湾岸諸国を対象としているが、日本企業が同地域で事業展開する際のESG開示の実態理解に役立つ。また、開示の質より量が先行する現象は、日本のESG報告の初期段階と共通する教訓を含む。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence from the GCC on the gap between ESG disclosure volume and quality, contributing to the global debate on symbolic vs substantive sustainability reporting. It highlights the need for stronger assurance and alignment with international frameworks like ISSB, relevant for emerging economies and firms operating in multiple jurisdictions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on the volume-quality distinction in ESG disclosure and its differential impact on financial performance in an emerging market context.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the risk of relying on high-volume, low-quality ESG disclosures for legitimacy; suggests investing in assurance and internal transformation for long-term value.
🏛政策担当者:Offers insights for designing mandatory disclosure standards and assurance requirements to enhance credibility of corporate sustainability communication in emerging markets.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study examines whether sustainability information disclosure (SID) in the Arab Gulf acts as a substantive strategic tool that enhances corporate outcomes or merely serves as a symbolic gesture to maintain legitimacy. Using data from 92 listed firms across the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) from 2020 to 2023, the study distinguishes between the level (volume) and quality (credibility) of disclosure. It examines their respective impacts on return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and financial reporting quality. The results reveal a consistent positive association between disclosure levels and financial performance, suggesting that volume-based corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting may support short-term legitimacy and market confidence. In contrast, disclosure quality shows weaker and less consistent effects, highlighting a potential disconnect between visibility and substance. This pattern reflects the strategic use of disclosure for symbolic compliance in the GCC, where ESG reporting is often adopted to satisfy external expectations rather than to support internal transformation or long-term value creation. The findings position sustainability disclosure as an underleveraged tool for strategic knowledge management. While current practices enhance legitimacy, they fall short of driving performance gains through internal learning or reporting integrity. Policy implications include the need for harmonised disclosure frameworks, mandatory assurance standards, and improved alignment with international ESG guidelines to strengthen the credibility and impact of corporate sustainability communication in emerging markets.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031394first seen 2026-05-05 23:09:51
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。