THE PURSUIT OF CREDIBILITY: A NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS OF GOVERNANCE AND GLOBAL TRENDS IN WASTE MANAGEMENT DISCLOSURE.
信頼性の追求:廃棄物管理開示におけるガバナンスとグローバル動向のナラティブ統合 (AI 翻訳)
Noor Faiza M. Ja’afar, Nor Adila Zulkifli, Maslinawati Mohamad
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、廃棄物管理開示の信頼性に関する文献を統合し、ガバナンス、規制動向、保証実務の相互作用を分析。開示の質は内部ガバナンス、外部規制、保証プロセスの整合性から生じる創発的特性であり、保証の価値提案には矛盾があることを指摘。質的比較分析や民族誌的研究などの方法論的進展を提言。
English
This narrative review synthesizes literature on waste management disclosure credibility, analyzing governance mechanisms, regulatory trends, and assurance practices. It finds disclosure quality is an emergent property of alignment between internal governance, external regulation, and assurance, highlighting contradictions in assurance's value proposition. Future research should adopt configurational and ethnographic methods.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、循環経済への移行が進む中、廃棄物管理の開示は投資家や取引先からの要求が高まっている。本レビューは、開示の信頼性を高めるための保証制度設計や規制の在り方について、日本企業や規制当局に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, disclosure frameworks like ISSB and CSRD are expanding beyond climate to include other environmental topics. This paper contributes to the understanding of credibility and greenwashing in waste reporting, offering insights for policymakers designing assurance mandates and for companies seeking to enhance disclosure quality.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides an integrative framework connecting legitimacy, institutional, and agency theories for studying disclosure credibility.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the importance of assurance design (level, scope, methodology) to avoid greenwashing in waste reporting.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that regulators must mandate not only assurance but also its specific design to combat greenwashing effectively.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Corporate waste management disclosure has become a critical nexus of accountability in the circular economy; however, concerns persist over its credibility and susceptibility to greenwashing. This narrative review synthesises the literature to critically examine the governance mechanisms, global regulatory trends, and assurance practices that shape the evolution of waste-related reporting. This review of scholarly work in accounting, governance, and sustainability studies identifies five interconnected themes: the contested efficacy of assurance design, the role of mandatory regulation as a catalyst, governance structures as antecedents, the symbolic-substantive disclosure spectrum, and the powerful moderating influence of contextual factors. A key insight is that disclosure quality is not a linear output but an emergent property of the alignment or misalignment between internal governance capability, external regulatory pressure, and mediating assurance processes. Major contradictions are found in the assurance value proposition, where it signals credibility but often fails to verify forward-looking claims or methodologically robust data, and in a pronounced Global North research bias that limits theoretical generalisability. Theoretically, this review contributes an integrative framework that positions legitimacy, institutional, and agency theories as complementary. In practice, this implies that regulators must mandate not only assurance but also its specific design (level, scope, methodology) to combat greenwashing effectively. Future research must adopt configurational and process-oriented methodologies, such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and ethnographic studies of the assurance nexus, particularly in under-researched emerging economies, to close the identified gaps between disclosure form and function.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://gaexcellence.com/ijepc/article/download/6941/6211first seen 2026-07-18 07:21:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。