gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

The illusion of green progress: Galicia’s wind power expansion as a state–corporate crime

Teresa Casas Grille

Justice, power and resistance📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-08#グリーンウォッシュOrigin: EU
DOI: 10.1332/26352338y2026d000000068
原典: https://doi.org/10.1332/26352338y2026d000000068

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、スペイン・ガリシア州の風力発電拡大(1990-2021年)を、グリーン移行の名の下に企業と国家が共謀して環境破壊と不平等を再生産する「国家-企業犯罪」として概念化する。緑の犯罪学と国家-企業犯罪理論を用いて、土地評価の断絶、社会的抵抗、国家-企業連携の3カテゴリーを分析。グリーン移行がインフラ植民地主義であると主張する。

English

This paper conceptualizes Galicia's wind power expansion (1990-2021) as state-corporate crime, arguing that green transition narratives and legal instruments enable territorial dispossession and structural inequality. Using green criminology and state-corporate crime theory, it identifies three analytical categories: land-valuation disconnection, social resistance, and state-corporate articulation. It proposes that the green transition functions as infrastructural colonization.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では再生可能エネルギー導入が進むが、本論文の批判的視点は、地域社会との軋轢や「グリーンウォッシング」リスクを認識する上で示唆に富む。日本の政策担当者は、環境アセスメントや住民合意の重要性を再考する材料となる。

In the global GX context

While the paper focuses on Spain, its critical lens on state-corporate entanglement in renewable energy deployment is globally relevant. It challenges the uncritical embrace of green transitions and highlights risks of social and environmental harm, which is pertinent for international frameworks like the just transition and energy justice.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical framework combining green criminology and state-corporate crime to analyze renewable energy conflicts.

🏢実務担当者:Offers cautionary insights for corporate sustainability teams about the social risks of large-scale renewable projects.

🏛政策担当者:Underscores the need for robust regulatory oversight and community engagement to prevent greenwashing and social harm.

📄 Abstract(原文)

There is a well-established body of literature on the socio-ecological conflicts that arise from the imposition of ‘green’ narratives used to justify renewable energy projects that, rather than representing a genuine ecological transition, perpetuate extractivism and consolidate corporate control over territories and resources. Building upon this critical tradition, this exploratory article assesses whether Galicia’s wind-power expansion (1990–2021) can be plausibly conceptualised as a form of state–corporate crime. Employing a qualitative exploratory analysis and a critical theoretical framework that combines green criminology with state–corporate crime theory, the study examines how ‘green transition’ narratives and legal–administrative instruments enable territorial dispossession and reproduce structural inequalities under the guise of sustainability. Focusing on regional policies, regulatory reforms, and a comprehensive review of existing scholarship, this research identifies three analytical categories – land-valuation disconnection, social resistance, and state–corporate articulation – through which the dynamics of environmental harm, legality, and power are critically examined. The findings indicate that Galicia’s wind-energy regime constitutes a clear instance of state–corporate crime (Bernat and Whyte, 2019). It represents a structural configuration in which legal and institutional frameworks not only authorise but also actively reproduce environmental and social harm, sustaining the illusion of ecological progress under the discourse of the green transition. Overall, the article proposes a coherent interpretive framework that redefines Galicia’s green transition as a process of infrastructural colonisation, exposing how state and corporate interests converge to reproduce extractivist logics under the rhetoric of ecological modernisation and laying the groundwork for future research on environmental crime within renewable energy governance.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。