← 論文一覧に戻る

GREEN FINANCE AND ESG INTEGRATION: PATHWAYS TO ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND CARBON NEUTRALITY

グリーンファイナンスとESG統合:環境パフォーマンスとカーボンニュートラルへの経路 (AI 翻訳)

Silvina Dwike Setyawati, Harlina Meidiaswati, Cici Widowati

The International Conference on Sustainable Economics Management and Accounting Proceedingジャーナル2026-08-10#ESG経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.32424/icsema.v2i1.699
原典: https://doi.org/10.32424/icsema.v2i1.699
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、グリーンファイナンスとESG統合が環境パフォーマンスとカーボンニュートラルに与える影響を体系的文献レビューと計量書誌学分析により解明した。2020年から2025年のScopus収録論文33件を分析し、グリーンクレジット、炭素取引、グリーンファンドが従来のグリーンボンドより直接的な環境効果を持つことを示した。また、グリーンウォッシングがシステムリスクとして機能し、制度の質や企業特性などの調整要因が重要であることを明らかにした。

English

This study uses a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of 33 Scopus-indexed articles (2020-2025) to examine how green finance and ESG integration impact environmental performance and carbon neutrality. It finds that green credit, carbon trading, and green funds have more direct environmental effects than conventional green bonds. It also identifies greenwashing as a systemic risk and highlights institutional quality, firm characteristics, and regional conditions as key moderating factors.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではSSBJ開示やカーボンニュートラル宣言が進む中、グリーンファイナンスとESG統合の統合的枠組みは、企業の開示実務や投資家対応に示唆を与える。特にグリーンウォッシングのリスク認識は、今後の開示品質向上に寄与する。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global GX scholarship by synthesizing the fragmented literature on green finance and ESG integration, offering a conceptual framework that links these to environmental performance and carbon neutrality. It underscores the role of greenwashing as a systemic risk, relevant for ISSB and CSRD implementation, and highlights research gaps in developing countries.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a conceptual framework and bibliometric map of green finance and ESG integration, useful for identifying research gaps and moderating factors.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into which green finance instruments (e.g., green credit, carbon trading) have direct environmental impact, aiding in strategic financing decisions.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the systemic risk of greenwashing and the need for robust institutional quality to ensure green finance effectiveness.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Growing global demands for sustainability and carbon neutrality have made green finance and ESG integration key issues on the sustainable development agenda. However, most research still addresses these two topics separately, resulting in a limited understanding of their combined impact on environmental performance and carbon neutrality. This study aims to identify research developments, map key themes, and construct a conceptual framework explaining the relationship between green finance, ESG integration, environmental performance, and carbon neutrality. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combined with bibliometric analysis of 33 Scopus-indexed articles from 2020 to 2025, selected in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and analysed using Biblioshiny in R Studio. The results indicate that publications have increased rapidly in recent years, but are still dominated by research from China, suggesting opportunities to develop similar research in developing countries, including Indonesia. Bibliometric mapping identified greenwashing, carbon emissions, and financial systems as the most dominant themes in the literature, whilst ESG integration and sustainable finance emerged as rapidly growing areas of study. The literature synthesis indicates that green credit, carbon trading, and green funds have a direct and measurable environmental impact compared to conventional green bonds. This study demonstrates that the relationship between green finance instruments, ESG integration, environmental performance, and carbon neutrality forms an integrated pathway framework that identifies institutional quality, firm characteristics, industry type, and regional conditions as key moderating factors, whilst positioning greenwashing as a systemic risk that may reduce the effectiveness of green finance and ESG implementation in driving the transition towards a low-carbon economy.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。