Dynamic Relationship Between ESG Disclosure and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Asian Capital Markets
ESG開示と企業パフォーマンスの動的関係:アジア資本市場からのエビデンス (AI 翻訳)
Saira Baloch, Kaneez Fatima, Nadir Khan, Surayya, Tauqeer Abbas
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2002年から2023年までのアジア11カ国・地域の上場企業1,406社を対象に、ESG開示が会計基準および市場ベースの企業業績に与える影響を分析。パネル回帰、グレンジャー因果性検定、構造方程式モデリングを用いた結果、ESG開示は収益性、市場評価、投資家の信頼を向上させ、資本コストを低下させることが明らかになった。この結果は、透明なサステナビリティ報告が情報非対称性と認識リスクを低減することを示唆する。
English
This study analyzes the impact of ESG disclosure on accounting and market-based performance of 1,406 listed firms across 11 Asian economies from 2002 to 2023. Using panel regression, Granger causality tests, and SEM, it finds that ESG disclosure significantly improves profitability, market valuation, and investor confidence while reducing cost of capital, suggesting that transparent sustainability reporting reduces information asymmetry and perceived risk.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ(サステナビリティ基準委員会)による開示基準の策定が進んでおり、本論文のアジア市場における実証結果は、ESG開示が企業価値向上に寄与することを示す点で、日本の企業や投資家にとって重要な示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides robust cross-country evidence from Asian capital markets that ESG disclosure enhances corporate performance and reduces cost of capital, supporting the global push for mandatory sustainability disclosure frameworks such as ISSB and CSRD.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers large-scale Asian empirical evidence on the ESG disclosure-performance relationship, extending literature beyond single-country studies.
🏢実務担当者:Shows that integrating ESG disclosure into strategy can improve profitability, market valuation, and lower financing costs.
🏛政策担当者:Provides evidence that mandating ESG disclosure benefits both firms and markets, supporting regulatory initiatives.
📄 Abstract(原文)
ESG disclosure has evolved as a vital element of corporate sustainability reporting nevertheless, empirical literature regarding its economic impacts still remains insufficient, particularly in Asian economies. This examination fills this gap by investigating the effect of enhanced ESG disclosure on accounting and market-based performance of publicly listed firms. The study employs panel dataset of 1,406 listed firms with 30,932 firm-year observations from 11 Asian economies, for a period of 22 years from 2002 to 2023. The association between ESG disclosure and corporate performance is studied using two-way fixed-effects panel regression. To guarantee the robustness of the findings, the analysis is supported with robustness tests, panel co-integration analysis, Granger causality tests, and Structural Equation Modelling. The empirical results show that ESG disclosure has a significant positive effect on accounting and market-based performance indicators of firms. It results in improved profitability, market valuation, investor confidence and reduced firms' cost of capital, which implies that transparent sustainability reporting decreases information asymmetry and perceived investment risk. The findings encourage firms to align ESG disclosure into their strategic and governance mechanisms in order to achieve improved performance with reduced costs and strong corporate image. Unlike prior studies that investigate individual countries and employ a single financial indicator of firm performance, this study extends the academic ESG literature by offering cross-country empirical evidence from Asian capital markets with a multidimensional analysis of corporate performance. References Aboud, A., & Diab, A. (2019). The financial and market consequences of environmental, social and governance ratings: The implications of recent political volatility in Egypt. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(3), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2018-0167 Al-Kake, F., Harun, A., Othman, B., & MH, N. (2019). The effect of corporate governance on firm profitability: Evidence from London Stock Exchange. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(2), 727–742. Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, F. H., & Al-Matari, Y. A. (2012). The impact of board characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from nonfinancial listed companies in Kuwaiti Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 310–332. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v2i2.2384 Alam, Z., & Tariq, Y. B. (2023). Corporate sustainability performance evaluation and firm financial performance: Evidence from Pakistan. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231184856 Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910 Altin, M., Al Ani, M. K., Hussainey, K., & Streimikiene, D. (2026). The impact of sustainability expenditures on ESG performance: The moderating role of financial reporting quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Advance online publication. Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: A case of a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.672 Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033 Balmer, J. M. T. (2001). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing: Seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 248–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110694763 Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., Shukeri, S. N., & Khojally, H. M. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and ESG reporting: Evidence from the Saudi stock market. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 6202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106202 Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1980 Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601 Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., & Hasan, I. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder risk, and idiosyncratic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.09.007 Boesso, G., Favotto, F., & Michelon, G. (2015). Stakeholder prioritization, strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: Further evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1359 Breuer, N., & Nau, C. (2014). ESG performance and corporate financial performance. Department of Business Administration. Buallay, A. (2019). Between cost and value: Investigating the effects of sustainability reporting on a firm's performance. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(4), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-12-2017-0137 Burgman, R. J., & Van Clieaf, M. (2012). Total shareholder return (TSR) and management performance: A performance metric appropriately used, or mostly abused? Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, 5(2), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.3138/rijpm.5.2.32 Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance (SSRN Working Paper No. 2508281). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508281 Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994 De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506 Delmas, M. A., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.676 Dias, A. (2013). Market capitalization and value-at-risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(12), 5248–5260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.015 Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 El-Bassiouny, D., & Letmathe, P. (2018). The adoption of CSR practices in Egypt: Internal efficiency or external legitimation? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(5), 642–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2017-0119 Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010 Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/3858020 Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 Ftiti, Z., Jeriji, M., Louhichi, W., Mensi, Y., & Zenaidi, A. (2024). ESG dimensions, firm performance and corporate governance systems. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 18(4–5), 492–521. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2024.139315 Gangi, F., Daniele, L. M., & Varrone, N. (2020). How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk-adjusted financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 1975–1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2479 Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2014). Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure. Management Decision, 52(10), 1928–1951. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2014-0296 Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002 Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001 Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9512280033 Hasan, M. S., & Omar, N. (2015). The impact of firm's level corporate governance on market capitalization. Journal of Investment and Management, 4(4), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150404.11 Helfaya, A., Morris, R., & Aboud, A. (2023). Investigating the factors that determine the ESG disclosure practices in Europe. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.63544/jbii.v5i7.106first seen 2026-07-27 06:11:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。