制度的説明責任のための政策革新として公衆衛生ガバナンスにESG指標を統合する：スコーピングレビュー
Integrating ESG indicators into public health governance as a policy innovation for institutional accountability: a scoping review (原題)
P. Catalfo, Daniele Virgillito, Giuseppe Messina, C. Ledda
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、企業開示から公衆衛生ガバナンスへのESG指標の応用を検討した。25件の研究・グレー文献を分析し、ESG統合の定義、実施レベル、ガバナンス用途、障壁、研究ギャップを整理。ESGフレームワークは報告慣行やSDGs整合性を強化しうるが、エビデンスは不均一で探索的であり、ガバナンス成果や健康アウトカムへの直接効果はほとんど示されていない。
English
This scoping review examines the translation of ESG indicators from corporate disclosure into public health governance. Synthesizing 25 studies and grey literature, it maps definitions, implementation levels, governance uses, barriers, and research gaps. ESG frameworks may strengthen reporting and SDG alignment, but evidence is heterogeneous and exploratory, with limited direct evidence on governance performance or health outcomes.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、SSBJ開示や有報でのサステナビリティ情報が拡充される中、ESG指標を公共部門やヘルスケアに応用する動きはまだ限定的。本レビューは、自治体や医療機関がESG的視点を導入する際の概念的整理に寄与し、今後の政策・制度設計の参考となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, as ESG frameworks expand beyond corporate reporting into public sector and health governance, this review provides a synthesis of current evidence and gaps. It highlights the need for sector-specific indicators and standardized reporting, relevant for policymakers and health system leaders aligning with SDGs and sustainability agendas.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:ESG指標の公共部門・ヘルスケア応用に関する研究ギャップと概念的整理を提供。
🏢実務担当者:医療機関や自治体がESG報告を導入する際の枠組みと課題の理解に有用。
🏛政策担当者:公衆衛生ガバナンスにおけるESG統合の政策設計と標準化の必要性を示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
To examine how ESG indicators and related frameworks are being translated from corporate disclosure into public health governance. Following PRISMA-ScR and the PCC framework, we synthesized 25 studies and grey-literature documents to map definitions, implementation levels, governance uses, barriers, and research gaps. ESG integration was defined as the use of environmental, social, and governance indicators to support accountability, transparency, stakeholder engagement, sustainability alignment, and strategic control in health systems. ESG-related frameworks may strengthen reporting practices, multisectoral coordination, and alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals when supported by leadership, technical capacity, harmonized indicators, and standardized reporting systems. However, the evidence remains heterogeneous and exploratory. Direct effects on governance performance, health outcomes, or equity are rarely demonstrated. Key gaps include unclear conceptual boundaries between ESG, CSR, SDG monitoring, and sustainability reporting, limited appraisal of reporting versus actual performance, measurement inconsistency, and under-representation of low-resource and Global South contexts. Future research should validate sector-specific ESG indicators and evaluate whether ESG integration improves accountability, equity, and sustainable public health governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2026.1609720first seen 2026-08-20 05:09:07 · last seen 2026-09-22 05:20:06
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。