Unveiling the moderating effect of corporate governance on the carbon emission and firm performance nexus: evidence from a carbon-non-regulated economy

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Provides evidence on the moderating role of governance in the emissions-performance nexus, relevant for scholars studying carbon finance in emerging economies.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights that stronger board oversight can reduce the negative financial impact of emissions, useful for corporate sustainability teams in unregulated markets.

🏛政策担当者:Suggests that promoting good governance may be more effective than punitive carbon regulations in achieving voluntary emission reductions.

Purpose This study aims to analyze the effect of corporate carbon emissions (CRBEs) on financial performance (FNP) in the context of a carbon-non-regulated economy. More importantly, the study also purports to analyze the moderating role of corporate governance (CRGV) practices in describing this nexus. Design/methodology/approach This study builds on a data set of 1,281 firm-year observations from 2014 to 2024, using a fixed-effects panel regression method to test the hypothesized relationships. Moreover, the robustness of the findings has been validated through Heckman’s two-stage regression and system GMM approach to control for self-selection bias and endogeneity issues. Findings The findings suggested that CRBE has a significant adverse effect on accounting (β = −0.038; p < 0.05) and market-based (β = −0.544; p < 0.01) financial performance. Furthermore, the results confirmed that CRGV negatively moderates the FNP–CRBE relationship at a 5% significance level. Specifically, firms with larger board size (β = −0.021, −0.088), greater board independence (β = −0.029, −0.095) and women’s representation on the board (β = −0.018, −0.172) were able to control the adverse effects of environmental degradation on the financial performance. Practical implications The present findings assist policymakers in using CRGV regulations to control the environmental consequences of corporate actions. Regulators can adopt affirmative policy measures to improve CRGV efficacy instead of penalty-based carbon regulations to enhance receptivity among business firms. Originality/value Despite growing importance, the extant literature has largely undermined the critical role of good governance in mitigating the adverse effects of CO2 emissions. The current study provides pioneering evidence on the moderating effect of CRGV on the FNP–CRBE within the unique context of a carbon non-regulated economy.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-06-2025-0421first seen 2026-06-18 05:40:04